There is an FBO at my home airport (PHN) that appears to be closing due to competition from a government entity. St. Clair County Airport (PHN) in Michigan is owned by the county of St. Clair. About a year ago the county announced that they were going into the business of selling fuel in hopes that the fuel sales would help offset the costs of operating the airport.
At the time there was only one FBO on the field, an FBO that had been there for quite a long time. There really isn't enough traffic at this airport to support two FBOs and the established business was forced to scale back when the county started competing with them. They have struggled to stay in business in spite of the competition but it looks like they are now closing.
The county has been selling fuel at lower prices than the FBO can afford especially considering that the FBO has to pay a fuel flow fee to the county for every gallon of fuel that they sell.
Now I'm all for competition but should a government entity go into business in competition with an established business that is actually a tenant of the county? Should they use public funds to finance their startup? Should the county be competing against a business while requiring that business to pay the county a percentage of their fuel sales?
The FBO has been a full service business but has had to scale back and now it looks like they are going to be leaving all together. The county cannot offer the same level of service that the FBO did so, in my opinion, the local aviation community is going to suffer the loss of the services that the FBO had been providing.
I contacted AOPA last year trying to find out if it was even legal for the county to do what they did. Apparently there is nothing in the law that says they can't. Anyone have any thoughts about this?
Jeannie
At the time there was only one FBO on the field, an FBO that had been there for quite a long time. There really isn't enough traffic at this airport to support two FBOs and the established business was forced to scale back when the county started competing with them. They have struggled to stay in business in spite of the competition but it looks like they are now closing.
The county has been selling fuel at lower prices than the FBO can afford especially considering that the FBO has to pay a fuel flow fee to the county for every gallon of fuel that they sell.
Now I'm all for competition but should a government entity go into business in competition with an established business that is actually a tenant of the county? Should they use public funds to finance their startup? Should the county be competing against a business while requiring that business to pay the county a percentage of their fuel sales?
The FBO has been a full service business but has had to scale back and now it looks like they are going to be leaving all together. The county cannot offer the same level of service that the FBO did so, in my opinion, the local aviation community is going to suffer the loss of the services that the FBO had been providing.
I contacted AOPA last year trying to find out if it was even legal for the county to do what they did. Apparently there is nothing in the law that says they can't. Anyone have any thoughts about this?
Jeannie