Where does it say that the examiner must endorse an FR if he's awarded a new rating? My reading of the regs says that is equivalent to an FR without any need for any endorsement.It satisfies the requirement of a Flight Review, if the examiner endorses your logbook with the FR endorsement. IPC maybe, if the examiner also signs you off assuming you've met the requirements for an IPC. AC 61-98 is the reference for both,
Where does it say that the examiner must endorse an FR if he's awarded a new rating? My reading of the regs says that is equivalent to an FR without any need for any endorsement.
Instrument check ride sets the IR currency date. Commercial ride is not an IR checkride.
I meant IF the examiner agrees to do an IPC in conjunction with the check ride. Entirely up to the examiner though.
If you covered everything that an IPC entails then yes.But what about doing a Mel and also instrument multi? Wouldn't that reset currency?
When I did my multi add on we did a hold, intercepting and 5 approaches. So when I did the approach on the checkride, there was the clock reset.But what about doing a Mel and also instrument multi? Wouldn't that reset currency?
It's possible, though unlikely, to take an instrument checkride and not be IFR current afterward. You have to have three hours of instrument training in the previous two months, but that doesn't necessarily have to include six approaches, holding and interception.
It's not likely, but instrument currency and checkride requirements are independent.
Flight reviews are entirely different. There are several explicit exceptions, including completion of a new rating.
Interesting. Never thought about that, but I can see how that scenario could happen! Recency is separate from the checkride... and it's possible you wouldn't have satisfied 61.57(c) even after successful completion of an Instrument checkride. Gotta check, before you get that ticket wet!
http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgFar.nsf/FARSBySectLookup/61.57
The six calendar month period described in paragraph (c) begins when a pilot successfully completes his or her practical test.
Checkride provides the same currency as an IPC.
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/pol_adjudication/agc200/interpretations/data/interps/2008/wynne - (2008) legal interpretation.pdf
Interesting. Never thought about that, but I can see how that scenario could happen! Recency is separate from the checkride... and it's possible you wouldn't have satisfied 61.57(c) even after successful completion of an Instrument checkride. Gotta check, before you get that ticket wet!
http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgFar.nsf/FARSBySectLookup/61.57
Did some more research. According to the FAA's own magazine, FAA Safety, legal interpretation is that a successful completion of an IPC or Instrument Checkride resets the 6-month clock.
https://www.faa.gov/news/safety_briefing/2015/media/SepOct2015.pdf
See page 12, article is on pages 10-12:
View attachment 44512
The FAA should add "successful completion of an IPC in the same category and class" to the 61.57(e) exclusion list.
Here's how it works to the best of my knowledge.
Jan 1, 2016 you get your IR ticket.
You are current until July 31, 2016.
Between February 1, 2016 and January 31, 2017 you can do 6+HIT under the hood with a safety pilot to reestablish/extend currency. (doing 6 approaches during Jan 2016 wont extend currency because it's based on calendar months)
After January 31, 2017 the only way to re-establish currency is with an IPC.
If one flew the requirements w/ a safety pilot, say between Sep '16 and Dec '16, you'd be current as you say. But wouldn't you have 6 months from Feb1 '17 to again log the requirements vs having to do an IPC? I'm so rusty on this it hurts! Don't punch me now!