Yes.. often in the limitations section, although technically not a limitation.We haven't discussed that, at least not that I remember.
Is it something I would find in the POH?
Yes, POH or AFM for demonstrated crosswind. What aircraft?
Yes.. often in the limitations section, although technically not a limitation.
It's in beginning of the normal procedures section, Section 4, Airspeeds for Normal Operation.'77 172N
It's not in the limitations section because it's not a limitation.Yes.. often in the limitations section, although technically not a limitation.
Many airplanes it IS listed in the limitation section. Can't say for sure about the OP's plane.It's in beginning of the normal procedures section, Section 4, Airspeeds for Normal Operation.
It's not in the limitations section because it's not a limitation.
And the winner is.... @dmspilot
Section 4 page 3
Maximum demonstrated crosswind velocity:
Takeoff or landing...... 15 knots
Thanks a bunch guys!
Name one.Many airplanes it IS listed in the limitation section.
Make sure you do have a discussion with your CFI about it. "Demonstrated" means something. They'll chat with you about how to know when crosswinds are unsafe...
Good luck on the first solo.
Most of the Citation line.Name one.
Lots of Citations used in primary training. Very relevant post. Thank you.Most of the Citation line.
But you conveniently overlook from the start that I said it's not always in that section.
then you'll be pulling the red handle.....If it were me, I would line up perpendicular to the runway and call final.
When the CFI asks what the hell I am doing I would state I am going to demonstrate crosswind.
* Ignore me. The thread has already provided a solution and subsequently started going south.
That is really private...then you'll be pulling the red handle.....
Kritch, I think you might be confused.Most of the Citation line.
I've gone sideways sometimes....does that count?crosswind pilots matter.....
If it were me, I would line up perpendicular to the runway and call final.
When the CFI asks what the hell I am doing I would state I am going to demonstrate crosswind.
* Ignore me. The thread has already provided a solution and subsequently started going south.
indeed it seems odd, but true. I just found section 3 (limitations) for a C680 on line.Kritch, I think you might be confused.
The manufacturer isn't going to put a demonstrated x-wind in the limitations section unless they specifically intend it to be a limitation, and then it I'll be published as a limit.
In the Citation manuals I have (different models in the 500 series, you will not find a demonstrated x-wind in the limitations section. Just a tailwind limit.
Why the snarky response? He said name one.Lots of Citations used in primary training. Very relevant post. Thank you.
A direct answer to the question that was asked, so if the answer is irrelevant, the question must be as well.Lots of Citations used in primary training. Very relevant post. Thank you.
indeed it seems odd, but true. I just found section 3 (limitations) for a C680 on line.
Look at the bottom of page 21.
As a side note, the section also has Va speeds, which I don't believe is technically a limitation either (could be wrong on that).
http://www.smartcockpit.com/download.php?path=docs/&file=Cessna_Citation_Sovereign-Limitations.pdf
It's a copy of the AFM published for training purposes seeing as though AFMs are aircraft specific.You posted a Flight Crew Operating Manual for a transport-category airplane. The Operating Manual is not FAA approved and does not govern the operation of the airplane. Therefore, the manufacturer can put any information they want, in any order. The real limitations are found in the AFM, not the OM.
I believe it was implied we were talking about AFMs, and normal category airplanes. In other words, information that might actually help OP answer their question.
I believe that if a question is limited in scope, the question should be phrased to reflect those limits in scope...yeah, the OP is probably unaware of the difference, but I also believe that simplifying without stating that the answer is simplified is bad primacy.You posted a Flight Crew Operating Manual for a transport-category airplane. The Operating Manual is not FAA approved and does not govern the operation of the airplane. Therefore, the manufacturer can put any information they want, in any order. The real limitations are found in the AFM, not the OM.
I believe it was implied we were talking about AFMs, and normal category airplanes. In other words, information that might actually help OP answer their question.
It's a copy of the AFM published for training purposes seeing as though AFMs are aircraft specific.
I'm not sure what your point is.It doesn't seem to be "a copy of the AFM" at all.
http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC 25.1581-1.pdf