denverpilot
Tied Down
Not really. The 182 and 172 are entirely different airframes that look similar. The Dakota and the Archer are essentially the same except for the engine and prop.
When I went from a 172 to a 182, I was surprised at how different it was. When I went from an Archer to a Dakota... Well, there wasn't much difference at all except in performance and having to pull a little harder to get the nose up on landing.
The 172 uses the same airfoil as the 182.
That surprises some. Including me until @flyingchessehead pointed it out.
See TCDS...
It flies different mostly because of added weight and horsepower including all that extra weight up front.
Bigger flippers in back (ode to Wolfgang...) so you’ll have a little extra force to hold the fat O-470 weight off the strut.