It’s great that your area isn’t affected and you can be dismissive. The ICU census at my hospital has been nearing capacity this week and we have the convention center standing by as a field hospital. Whether or not it will be needed will play out in the next few weeks. It’s not just that we need the beds for COVID patients, but that all of the other patients needing ICU care don’t have anywhere to go. The county fairgrounds had to be converted to a makeshift testing facility because all of the clinics were overwhelmed with people seeking tests. My friends and colleagues in Utah, Massachusetts, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania are all having the same experience and those are just the people I keep in touch with. I’ve intentionally stayed away from these kinds of posts, but enough is enough with the idea that there is some exaggeration of the seriousness of this event or that the problem is actually infrastructure related, young reporters, or whatever other conspiracy theory is popular that particular day.
I wasn’t dismissive. I was giving a report of local reality direct from our local hospitals.
(I could offer regular updates*, the point of the post was good hospital and medical facility employees have the numbers in their company inbox every morning. It’s also clearly been communicated that the data and emails aren’t in any way proprietary — anybody wants ‘em, all they have to do is ask. Nobody’s asking here.)
I also carefully said some other places are worse. Many that didn’t build appropriate infrastructure. Many that have different human density numbers with lower population to infrastructure ratios or old worn out infrastructure that wasn’t augmented or replaced.
Dismissive, or at least barely mildly rude, would be reminding those places that their “leaders” found plenty of land and ten year tax breaks for their Amazon warehouses. LOL. If you want hard math, there’s some.
In seriousness though, where are you located? I’m sorry whatever the math shows for your area isn’t working out well. Why aren’t they better prepared for math that hasn’t changed significantly in 9 months?
I didn’t even go into preparedness. Wife’s place was prepped in April to have 2000 makeshift beds for Covid. They shuttered and mothballed all of it. Can bring it back online very quickly if needed.
This IS a snarky question ... but y’all should be snarky asking it HARD of locals there if it’s as bad as you say... What changes in the linear math told anybody in planning there that they shouldn’t be ready for what you’re currently seeing? The math hasn’t changed in almost a year.
You should be (righteously) ****ed off at local planners right now if people have “nowhere to go”. Seriously. They’ve had nearly a year to plan.
Kinda like when schools had no plan whatsoever after six months of downtime.
Probably should have worked harder on that...
Many in that biz were angry when math folk asked that question. Oh well. Be mad. If you waste time in an emergency you get correctly criticized. Work off of today’s numbers and get moving. Numbers change, then change plans.
In your local case, there had to be at least one person who could extrapolate a linear formula. Nothing about this math is rocket science.
Definitely not saying I’m not sad for people living where proper mathematical planning is non-existent. Just saying it ain’t the same everywhere and not everyone is dealt the same hand.
On a more personal question level, have you considered temporarily repositioning away from the density problem and (apparently) bad planners? Not a fun thought for all sorts of seriously inconvenient reasons but if their bad planning adds more risk of harm to you than not... getting away from their silliness is an option. A sucky option, but an option nevertheless.
Takes some head scratching and math to figure out where the relocation would be to. Quite a few showing up here but the housing market being what it is, they’re ending up in very dense population areas for the most part.
Maybe not the best plan, given the math of the thing. Depends on where they came from, I suppose.
Zero intent to claim “exaggeration” of “seriousness”. Quite the opposite. Said the press here aren’t asking here and aren’t being serious. The hospitals are.
Sounds like you have local planners who also aren’t taking the local math seriously as well. Definitely a worse form of not being serious.
Given the option, I’ll take a useless (mostly because their business model is incredibly weak and likely dying, unfortunately for them) local press with serious planners being ignored, over the opposite, any day of the week.
Just observations. All anyone can do is make their own plan with this thing... real math makes it easier. Percentages of a changeable resource. aren’t valid math.