Darrell111
Pre-takeoff checklist
smigaldi said:
How about them apples!!
smigaldi said:
Next thing you know they will be making us all play hockey and eat crulers!!Brian Austin said:Darn Canadians will be spreading their idealogy all over the world...eh...what exactly IS the idealogy of Canada?
Brian Austin said:Darn Canadians will be spreading their idealogy all over the world...eh...what exactly IS the idealogy of Canada?
Richard said:Attrition? But before that is change in ideology. What can be learned can be unlearned.
Been watching the kurling thing on the Olympics....okay, been watching the WOMEN'S kurling. There are some hottie kurlers out there. Crikeys!smigaldi said:kurling
N2212R said:and touques.
smigaldi said:
woodstock said:wonder where in Canada - if they have that much, maybe Alaska would take us away from the ME - at least for now.
woodstock said:wonder where in Canada - if they have that much, maybe Alaska would take us away from the ME - at least for now.
woodstock said:wonder where in Canada - if they have that much, maybe Alaska would take us away from the ME - at least for now.
alaskaflyer said:Alaska is NOT another country.
astanley said:Just a general reply - it doesn't matter which country we get our oil from, as oil is a globally traded commodity market and the price of a barrel of oil is (generally - there are broad assumptions here [I'm not going to get into Brent vs. NYMEX vs. etc...]) the price of a barrel of oil, regardless of where it gets pumped out.
Our dependence on oil in general needs to be curbed - just because it is a commodity that can be controlled. From the risk perspective, let's not put all of our eggs in the petro basket.
Cheers,
-Andrew
Coal oil contains more BTUs per pound than #2 diesel fuel, and is being produced by an indepandent at $1.70 in Pa. it is estamated that there is 250 years of fuel in Pa. alone.astanley said:Just a general reply - it doesn't matter which country we get our oil from, as oil is a globally traded commodity market and the price of a barrel of oil is (generally - there are broad assumptions here [I'm not going to get into Brent vs. NYMEX vs. etc...]) the price of a barrel of oil, regardless of where it gets pumped out.
Our dependence on oil in general needs to be curbed - just because it is a commodity that can be controlled. From the risk perspective, let's not put all of our eggs in the petro basket.
Cheers,
-Andrew
NC19143 said:Coal oil contains more BTUs per pound than #2 diesel fuel, and is being produced by an indepandent at $1.70 in Pa. it is estamated that there is 250 years of fuel in Pa. alone.
Hitler ran his war machine on coal oil for over 5 years. it is here now! and cheap. why doesn't the US adopt it as the option?
And to top it off, Alaska has more coal in the ground than the world has used to date.
National news had an article on it last month, they said enough coal oil conversion plants could be built in 12 months to eliminate the requirement for off shore crude.
astanley said:Excellent point. But as Joe W can probably attest to, some of our larger coal firms don't have a very stellar record in treating their neighbors fairly. There was just a large (albiet biased) article in the recent National Geographic about coal mining in West Virginia, talking about the (lack of) virtues in strip mining out east...
Just a point, I do believe that coal is a place to look as we progress.
Cheers,
-Andrew
F.W. Birdman said:It looks like the UK is not the place to go
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/19/nsharia219.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/02/19/ixnewstop.html
astanley said:Just a general reply - it doesn't matter which country we get our oil from, as oil is a globally traded commodity market and the price of a barrel of oil is (generally - there are broad assumptions here [I'm not going to get into Brent vs. NYMEX vs. etc...]) the price of a barrel of oil, regardless of where it gets pumped out.
Our dependence on oil in general needs to be curbed - just because it is a commodity that can be controlled. From the risk perspective, let's not put all of our eggs in the petro basket.
Cheers,
-Andrew
F.W. Birdman said:It looks like the UK is not the place to go
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/19/nsharia219.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/02/19/ixnewstop.html
flyingcheesehead said:"This story has been removed for legal reasons."
Hmmm...
SkyHog said:Plain and simple: The expenditure will continue until we have either made the Muslim's stop threatening us, or until we get a Democrat into office, who's shortsightedness will cause us to pull out and leave a mess behind. Just like JFK and his refusal to follow through in Cuba, the next Democrat President will embarrass us again (if the war is still going on).
I'd much rather stop the Muslims, then have to stop a president.
wbarnhill said:How do you win a war when every enemy you kill is replaced by 10 others?