It is structure, you allow it to progress, it can become unairworthy.So is that enough to make it unairworthy until repaired? What is the repair procedure?
yep.. the Cessna's have a problem in this area. almost every seat track I pull has some corrosion.so....maybe they were fixing other corrosion? No biggie Tom. See this all the time.....
yep.. the Cessna's have a problem in this area. almost every seat track I pull has some corrosion.
Moral of the story, don't live on the coast
what years were he 182s.I have pulled these several times in a 182, never had corrosion under them. Makes me wonder if a water trapped between the rail and a wet floor is the causation.
what years were he 182s.
undoubtedly better cared for than many.1979
I do not.Tom, do you fay-seal new new seat rails? This seems like a common problem.
Time for a major repair ?
It's common where ever they used that glue.Now that one is common.
so...what.
It's common where ever they used that glue.
170s have a problem the same cause on the rear cabin former where Cessna glued the head liner
I've seen a couple with the corrosion where you showed it. referred both to repair facilities.
That's about the worst I've seen. Exfoliation. What did the underlying structure look like?That ain't nuttin', here's what I found in my Cherokee:
You'd be surprised how little it takes to compromise the strength.Those didn't look bad to me, certainly worth cleaning up since you were checking but hardly serious.
Don’t you know?
Everyday mundane stuff is newsworthy in this day and age. Get with the program.
Exactly. It's mundane to a lot of owners until the corrosion is found in their airplanes. Then it's not mundane anymore. It's expensive. Topics like this should help educate potential buyers of what to watch out for when looking at ancient airplanes, and most of the fleet is getting pretty ancient. And too many think that because aluminum doesn't rust it should last forever. They've never been mechanics dealing with this stuff. Aluminum, especially copper-alloyed aluminum like the 2024 commonly used in light airplanes and the 7000 series zinc-alloyed stuff used more in heavy aircraft, can corrode at an amazing rate under the right conditions. Adding copper or zinc makes the aluminum much stronger, but like everything in aviation there are compromises, and corrodability is the tradeoff here.Some of us who are less knowledgeable than some of you actually find this interesting. I will never understand why some feel the need to throw darts at those who actually teach some of us.
It's like some people are so unhappy with their lives that they have to lash out at others for absolutely no reason other than to sound superior.
When it's done for such a "mundane" topic it just comes across as churlish.
Why not just move onto the next post if you have no interest rather, than bringing such negativity?
You'd be surprised how little it takes to compromise the strength.
Exactly,, this area is covered in an AD in Cessna singles. This is why it almost mandatory to do the AD check on any aircraft prior to buying.Exactly. It's mundane to a lot of owners until the corrosion is found in their airplanes. Then it's not mundane anymore. It's expensive. Topics like this should help educate potential buyers of what to watch out for when looking at ancient airplanes, and most of the fleet is getting pretty ancient. And too many think that because aluminum doesn't rust it should last forever. They've never been mechanics dealing with this stuff. Aluminum, especially copper-alloyed aluminum like the 2024 commonly used in light airplanes and the 7000 series zinc-alloyed stuff used more in heavy aircraft, can corrode at an amazing rate under the right conditions. Adding copper or zinc makes the aluminum much stronger, but like everything in aviation there are compromises, and corrodability is the tradeoff here.
I don't see it there Dan, I just see surface stuff, like someone spilled their coke or fruit juice. No penetration. I do agree that once you start seeing holes or even craters you should become concerned as these can act as stress concentrators.
You may want to look again. Those Cherokee rails that were posted are the worst I’ve ever seen. That is far beyond surface corrosion, they’re dust.
Even the ones posted by Tom that are the subject of this thread are beyond just surface corrosion and Tom was doing the right thing by treating it.
The floor skin is thin. Corrosion creates millions of tiny pits that act as stress concentrators. It's not just a nice smooth, level reduction in thickness. And those pits harbor further moisture that accelerates the electrolytic processes involved in corrosion.I was responding to the original post.
Cleaned right up, and looked good. A nice surprize.That's about the worst I've seen. Exfoliation. What did the underlying structure look like?
The floor skin is thin. Corrosion creates millions of tiny pits that act as stress concentrators. It's not just a nice smooth, level reduction in thickness. And those pits harbor further moisture that accelerates the electrolytic processes involved in corrosion.
Castings like the massive spar carrythroughs found in the Cessna 177 and 210 are subject to corrosion caused by water getting into the roof or condensing in the ceiling as a result of the breathing of the occupants. Cessna gets pretty excited about that corrosion, since it has been found to create voids within the casting that have only a tiny entrance.
We're talking about structural parts, and that floor skin is a structural part. It carries flight loads like almost every other skin in the airplane and is part of the landing gear box's rigidity. The pitting and surface corrosion, if not cleaned up and treated, would continue at an accelerated rate until some other mechanic discovered that the whole floor needed tearing out and replacing. Or something cracked due to flight and landing loads on a badly weakened part.Fortunately I didn't see any of those issues in the original post, in fact it looked as good as new after he cleaned it up. We are talking floor skin and seat rail here with superficial oxidation, not carry through spars with corrosion you depict above.
Not true..Landing gear boxes are the skin forward of the floor skin.and is part of the landing gear box's rigidity.