Stache
snip
I am open to any input someone has that indicates a airframe rated mechanic can perfrom the compass swing and please provide any references. Even Stache is able to listen and learn.[/SIZE said:
the decision process is simple, Is an adjustment a repair? because that is what a compass swing is, an adjustment to the compass compensator for north south east and west. simple adjustment that is all it is.
We never have said an A&P can repair any instrument. So your reference to that is not the issue.
Swinging the wet compass after an install or swinging it after any magnetic field change, is nothing more than adjusting the mixture knob of the carburator after installing it, or adjusting it for rich lean
I have seen a multitude of log books with entries saying the wet compass was removed and replaced and swung, with only an A&P for return to service.
Too many in fact to say it was ilegal. And Never once seen a FSDO raise an issue with who did the swing, even after accidents investigations reviews
FAA airworthiness inspectors like your self have been issuing replacement airworthiness certificates with wet compass correction cards installed by A&Ps for a very long time, with no problems.
I do not know why you say A&P mechanics can not service and adjust aircraft components like the wet compass. When the FAR 65.81 says they can.
I quote (again)
65.81 General privileges and limitations.
(a) A certificated mechanic may perform or supervise the maintenance, preventive maintenance or alteration of an aircraft or appliance, or a part thereof,
Aren't all instruments appliances? how about the carb? altimeter? voltage regulators? magneto? A&Ps make adjustments to these every day, yet you say we can't, Why? how is a wet compass any different than any other appliance?
If you do not believe me maybe you should look at where the ADs on compasses are listed in the FAA AD data base. Yep! you guessed it, in the appliance list.
So your reading of FAR 65.81 would limit the A&P from doing any work on appliances. Or to look at it another way, your interpertation amounts to a rule change with out the proper notices to rule making be placed in public forum for comment.
I also think that the EAA and the AOPA should take action on this issue. because your decision will effect the way every aircraft large or small is maintained from now on.
Every one on these pages knows you are a FSDO airworthiness inspector working in the Oakland FSDO, that stigma stays with you even when you say you do this on your own.
Every one I talk to at FSDO (that's 4 today alone) say these messages reflect on them. I would really step back and see how this may effect your job. believe me, that is not a threat from me, It simply is what I am passing on as a heads up.