I agree, so I guess there was no reason to yell.
I didn't mean to offend. The bold red underlined text was to get your attention. Something that several posts previous failed to do. If you had substituted "detained" for "arrested" I wouldn't have posted at all.
In many states it is legal for LEO to detain for 72 hours. There is no paperwork, you cannot call a lawyer, you cannot call mommy.
I heard that it was inserted federally in the Patriot Act but I'm unable to sustain that.
I know the 72 hour rule applies where i live for LEO to ascertain your identity. Before that came out, I'd already solved that problem, but I was really concerned for those of my brethren who may run afoul of this mischievous "law".
If LEO can hold you 24, 48, 72 hours is your experience in a holding cell any different than the guy that got booked for DUI?
Yes, for the reasons I already stated.
As far as detaining you in order to ascertain your identity: If a pilot provides the documents that they are legally required to possess, this question will have been settled.
I highly doubt that you will be placed in a jail cell until you can produce a logbook. Think about it... If you are in a jail cell, exactly how will you be able to hand over a logbook that is not in your possession? That would not be possible. What is possible, and even probable, is that if the LEO really wanted to see your logbook they would give you a citation and require you to produce it at a later date.
Just like if you received a ticket from a traffic cop for not having proof of drivers insurance. You tell the LEO that you left it at home. The LEO writes you a ticket. You appear in court and prove you had insurance coverage and they either send you on your way free and clear or have you pay a fine for not carrying a required document. In the case of the pilot, the document isn't actually required to be carried, so not having it when it was originally requested will be a non-issue by the time you produce it for their perusal, because you would no-doubt bring proof that it wasn't required, along with contact names/numbers of government officials that can also attest to the same.
...
I know that this being the internet and all, it's great fun to play what-if games and inflate everything for drama and ego. But outside in the real world? I just don't see it. Not without something serious being thrown in to the mix, like a pilot absolutely refusing to cooperate with a reasonable request, or becoming abusive toward the LEO, or having no form of government issued ID, or possessing illegal items, etc.
Again - has anyone actually called the AMOC hotline number to see if this is still an issue? The fax date of the original AMOC document shows April 2011. It is very possible, even probable, that all of this has been resolved and put to bed by now, and that the LEO mentioned in the first post were acting on outdated guidance that could have been corrected by a call to the hotline.