RJM62
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2007
- Messages
- 13,157
- Location
- Upstate New York
- Display Name
Display name:
Geek on the Hill
I got an "Extreme Threat Alert" with a "Shelter in Place" order on my phone today while I was driving on the Thruway. It turns out a cosmetic factory in New Windsor blew up. That would have been roughly 20 or 30 miles away from where I was at the time.
I didn't learn the reason until a few minutes ago, however, when I started searching for it just out of curiosity. The warning itself gave absolutely no information regarding the reason for the alert, the nature of the threat, the location, nor anything else. All the cell phone alert said was that it was "extreme" and that I should "shelter in place."
Isn't that kind of useless? And for those who actually trust that the people issuing these alerts have any common sense at all, doesn't it risk making things worse by causing a panic? There are people who actually believe that when the government says something, it's true. Might they not have thought that we were under attack by North Korea or in the midst of some similarly horrid event when that alert went through?
I, on the other hand, scanned the local radio stations, heard nothing about terrorist attacks, NoKo nukes, or mass shootings, and went my merry way. I figured more than likely some dip**** bureaucrat pushed the wrong button.
I have only the "Extreme" alerts enabled because I got tired of being woken up at all hours of the night to be informed of things like snowstorms in Buffalo and missing kids in Boston. But at least those alerts contained information about the reasons, locations, etc. This "Extreme" alert had none of that. It said only that it was "extreme" and that I was to "shelter in place."
I'm curious whether this alert was just poorly executed, or if the powers that be deliberately leave out the reasons, locations, and so forth from "Extreme" alerts to prevent people from using their own judgment about whether or not the alert is worth taking seriously.
Rich
I didn't learn the reason until a few minutes ago, however, when I started searching for it just out of curiosity. The warning itself gave absolutely no information regarding the reason for the alert, the nature of the threat, the location, nor anything else. All the cell phone alert said was that it was "extreme" and that I should "shelter in place."
Isn't that kind of useless? And for those who actually trust that the people issuing these alerts have any common sense at all, doesn't it risk making things worse by causing a panic? There are people who actually believe that when the government says something, it's true. Might they not have thought that we were under attack by North Korea or in the midst of some similarly horrid event when that alert went through?
I, on the other hand, scanned the local radio stations, heard nothing about terrorist attacks, NoKo nukes, or mass shootings, and went my merry way. I figured more than likely some dip**** bureaucrat pushed the wrong button.
I have only the "Extreme" alerts enabled because I got tired of being woken up at all hours of the night to be informed of things like snowstorms in Buffalo and missing kids in Boston. But at least those alerts contained information about the reasons, locations, etc. This "Extreme" alert had none of that. It said only that it was "extreme" and that I was to "shelter in place."
I'm curious whether this alert was just poorly executed, or if the powers that be deliberately leave out the reasons, locations, and so forth from "Extreme" alerts to prevent people from using their own judgment about whether or not the alert is worth taking seriously.
Rich