Most of the world (except the US) use this terminology since it's an ICAO term.
Yeah, I know, but in Aus it applies to the guy that comes to the house and charges the air conditioning.
Most of the world (except the US) use this terminology since it's an ICAO term.
So, I can legally remove, replace, and reinstall a tire, and can clean and repack wheel bearings. But I CANNOT do a simple compression check, which, in my opinion is a MUCH simpler operation.
Not that there is any logic with the FAA, but where is the logic in that?
There is none because it's not true.
I'm about to shock you. A very large portion of the GA fleet is just that, owners with their tool box out in the hangar working away on their airplanes. They either find an A&P to sign it off or they do the work and don't say (or log) anything.
.
And Jim
.
And the FAA inspector I asked today. He looked at me and laughed when I asked and told him why. He said "Of course you can."
Asked him if you could do a compression check.
"Can what?" "Return it to service after logging a low reading?" Bet you didn't ask him that. BTW, asked an "Airworthiness Inspector" or just an "Operations Inspector"?
dtuuri
We're back to picking flysh*t out of pepper. And we're trying to do it with boxing gloves no less.
I'm a newbie on this board, but that seems to be a common theme around here!
I speak for myself.BTW, I know it's a Levy line that Operations Inspectors cannot comment on maintenance or that AW Inspectors can't comment on flight operations but......
It isn't misleading because an A&P is supposed to know when it's too low--and why. That's not something a pilot is charged with determining, so can't make a knowledgeable determination. For all you know, the OP rents planes to students and wants to gap the plugs and log the compressions. That means making airworthiness decisions far beyond just gapping plugs, IMO.And of course your comment about returning to service after "logging a low reading" is a bit misleading. If an A&P cannot return to service after logging a low reading, then why would a PP attempt to do so?
For all you know, the OP rents planes to students and wants to gap the plugs and log the compressions. That means making airworthiness decisions far beyond just gapping plugs, IMO.
dtuuri
Ok, so maybe you or your friend don't rent. It doesn't change my point.OP here. Firstly, let me repeat the reason for the question. A friend of mine, who flies a lot, wants to carefully monitor the compression trends of his 1500 hour engine.
You/your "friend" need to sign off your work, i.e., return to service after gapping the plugs. Determining unairworthy spark plug gaps are preventive maintenance you can sign off, determining unairworthy cylinders by means of a compression check are not.Secondly, how in the world does "log the compressions" = "making airworthiness decisions"?
It's a compliance document. Its proof of compliance. There's no requirement for a compression check during spark plug maintenance by a pilot. Doing so places him unnecessarily at risk. Now, maybe there should be a requirement to do a compression check? How would AOPA stand on that I wonder? If a pilot says he did it, but the engine then fails--would the pilot lose his pilot's license? Or just his spark plug privileges?He will probably not put them in the log because of all the gnashing of teeth from people that view the logbook as some sort of sacred document.
Oh yeah? You're mad huh? Well, I can't believe somebody asks a question, then gets mad at the answer. If all you want is "agreement" what are you doing posting here? And why can't your "friend" ask for himself, what are you, his marketing agent? Frankly, I can't see why ANYBODY disagrees with me on this point, much less RotorandWing. I think he's been watching too many movies. :wink2:...I'd like to know the downside and/or illegality to it?
In any case, I've heard enough.
Oh yeah? You're mad huh? Well, I can't believe somebody asks a question, then gets mad at the answer. If all you want is "agreement" what are you doing posting here? And why can't your "friend" ask for himself, what are you, his marketing agent? Frankly, I can't see why ANYBODY disagrees with me on this point, much less RotorandWing. I think he's been watching too many movies. :wink2:
dtuuri
OK, I'm not done.
Yes, I asked a question. I got reasoned explanations why it would be legal and rhetoric and hand-waving as to why it would be illegal. 6 pages in all. And yes, my mind is made up now, mostly because of posts made by people I've learned to respect.
"Everything which is not forbidden is allowed"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everything_which_is_not_forbidden_is_allowed
Let's try to keep it that way.
...There's no requirement for a compression check during spark plug maintenance by a pilot. Doing so places him unnecessarily at risk...
Not what I was trying to say. You lifted me out of context:I'm having a difficult time fathoming the perceived logic of this statement. You are saying that if there is a bad cylinder the pilot is better off not knowing about it.
I was referring to the logbook entry. Like I said before, up-thread, until somebody figures out how to botch a compression check so badly it hurts somebody and the FAA investigates it, they won't care. But recording readings you made and then signing off the logbooks returns the airplane to service, leaving the pilot exposed should something fail. Why put anything in there in the first place (other than the gapping). Just check it and call a mechanic if it looks suspicious, don't put your name to it. That's what I'm trying to say.It's a compliance document. Its proof of compliance. There's no requirement for a compression check during spark plug maintenance by a pilot. Doing so places him unnecessarily at risk.
...But recording readings you made and then signing off the logbooks returns the airplane to service, leaving the pilot exposed should something fail...
"Everything which is not forbidden is allowed"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everything_which_is_not_forbidden_is_allowed
Let's try to keep it that way.
Are you a lawyer or something? I mean seriously, people lay awake at night dreaming stuff like this up to worry about?
Are you a lawyer or something? I mean seriously, people lay awake at night dreaming stuff like this up to worry about?
No, the prick is a former "professional Pilot' according to his bio, and a Pilot Examiner. I cannot find him as a DPE so that may or may not be true.
What we have here is some jerknose who was a "professional pilot" and $#it all over the folks who were maintaining his aircraft, just like most of those of his genre.
Jim
Professional pilot and professional mechanic all rolled into one
Personal attacks are prohibited. This specifically means any text/post that is blatantly attacking another person on or off the forum, especially in a personal way.
I'm no lawyer, but anybody taking your advice should be sure to have a good one.
Can you put your finger over the spark plug hole/move prop to check compression. Or do you need a note from the adjutant general counsel for that?
Can you put your finger over the spark plug hole/move prop to check compression. Or do you need a note from the adjutant general counsel for that?
I still don't understand why you would track compressions in the log book.
You're right Jim, he is a jerk.
For all intents of checking compression one doesn't even have to pull the plugs or cowl except to get a baseline. After that one can just attach a pull scale to the prop at a specific and constant location and pull it through 4 compressions and compare the force required vs last time as well as the other cylinders.
Just reading this thread makes me happy I don't have to own a plane or buy one. I will just keep renting. Sounds like the planes I could afford who knows what kind of monkey has been wrenching on it. I just shudder to think of buying a plane that has been "maintained" by some of the posters on this thread!
Just reading this thread makes me happy I don't have to own a plane or buy one. I will just keep renting. Sounds like the planes I could afford who knows what kind of monkey has been wrenching on it. I just shudder to think of buying a plane that has been "maintained" by some of the posters on this thread!
lol, and how exactly is renting a solution for your over-the-top irrational fears?