As pilots and mechanics we all have an opinion. I just asked the question does the renter pilot meet the intent of part 43.
So stop and think, renter removes the cowling for an example on an aircraft like a CE-172 that has some screws in the cowling. No problem taking it off it’s a simple task unless you for get to disconnect the landing light wire. Okay performed a detailed preflight inspection on the engine no problem. Reinstalls the cowling with the screws. Question what torque would the renter pilot torque the screws that go into nut plates?
Is tightening the screwed to a specific torque called out in a maintenance manual? Is a special tool required to check the screw torque? Would a record entry be required to show the screws were installed correctly?
A person could make a record entry on a piece of paper and document what they did and its legal. So having the hard cover records is not required in this case.
Now what if, the landing light wire was not connected and the light was required for a night landing and the aircraft has an incident. Now what would renter pilot do or is it the responsibility of the owner/FBO.
There may be a good reason to remove the cowling as some have stated like the large oil spot or fuel dripping. But it should be written up as a discrepancy and given to a maintenance person to fix then return to service.
Guy keep in mind not all cowling are the same to remove. Some can be taken off with a few latches, long pins or other methods. These could be considered minor any may be taken off during a preflight.
Stop and think about it before you go off on me for my opinion. If it weren’t for lawyers we wouldn’t be having this discussion would we?
Oh, a pilot can add oil to the engine is my opinion.
Just one man’s opinion.