RudyP
Cleared for Takeoff
If you add up EWR + JFK + LGA you get 1.2M operations. Not sure how much MDW contributes but bravo for bravo, I'm pretty sure NYC is busier than Chicago.
At what field? ORD? The VFR corridor is right over the top. Departures don't interfere at all.
And of course it's turned sideways.
How wide is the VFR corridor going to be? How long does it take an airliner to climb that high? Keep in mind that these aren't point-in-space problems, these are hockey-puck problems and there's always some slop baked into the system so that a single mistake doesn't cause a catastrophe.
I don't expect wholesale changes to the 7110.65 or ORD airspace to accommodate us... And if you do expect that, arguing with a couple of front-line controllers is going to get you exactly nowhere.
We utilize every available altitude to keep the primary and satellite airports moving with respect to IFR operations. ATC's primary responsibilities are the safe and efficient movement of aircraft in the National Airspace System and the issuance of safety alerts. If the operation changed to create a corridor to allow VFR aircraft safe transit over ORD, VFR aircraft would have at best a 500 foot window to make that transit. Doing so would require all arrivals to enter dump zones higher, which would accrue delay to arrivals for sequencing. I could explain why, but that would get very technical (boring). Moreover, would you feel comfortable transiting busy airspace with no other outs should the weather be anything less than clear and unrestricted visibility?
Convenient. Maybe a change is in order.
I figure 2nm is plenty wide, I'd be happy with 1nm. Northbound traffic gets 4 and 6, southbound gets 5 and 7. Make it /G with way points if necessary. I offered a proposal, and the response is "we don't do it that way now." Well, no ****. If you did do it that way now, there could be a VFR corridor. I ask for more info and get brushed aside Pelosi style. We're told we don't know what's going on, and when we ask, we're not allowed to know. How quaint.
The numbers in bold add up to way more than 881,933, and they do just fine handling VFR guys.
Why don't you add in the 215,000 MDW operations, as well as the 100,000 from DPA, and the 100,000 for PWK, and 100,000 for LOT and you'll be there.
Convenient. Maybe a change is in order.
Though that might require some effort on the Fed's part, and we know can't have that. "We've been doing it this way for years, we aren't going to change!"
I figure 2nm is plenty wide, I'd be happy with 1nm. Northbound traffic gets 4 and 6, southbound gets 5 and 7. Make it /G with way points if necessary. I offered a proposal, and the response is "we don't do it that way now." Well, no ****. If you did do it that way now, there could be a VFR corridor. I ask for more info and get brushed aside Pelosi style. We're told we don't know what's going on, and when we ask, we're not allowed to know. How quaint.
And hell, this is only for VFR. I'm not not even proposing an IFR corridor. That I know would be a pain in the ass.
What's the big deal about going around or under the outer ring?
A lot of times, controllers won't know, or won't think to ask, if a pilot circumnavigating airspace wants a shortcut. I've asked pilots if they would like direct routing only to have a pilot advise me he/she would rather stay on filed route. It happens. For that reason, it never hurts to ask ATC if there is any chance of a shortcut.
Not a big problem VFR. It's when you're trying to go somewhere IFR that it's a pain, mainly because of the position of Chicago in relation to Lake Michigan, a body of water cold enough that most of us don't want to fly over in a single.
Seems like you would be happy with your clearance..??BTW, FWIW, here's my track from the flight in the OP:
http://www.foreflight.com/s/track/1417395060-47252838-567A-4C0D-9224-97F44926CD2F/
flyingcheesehead said:So how do we ever get to ask for any sort of shortcut through C90 airspace?
If you add up EWR + JFK + LGA you get 1.2M operations. Not sure how much MDW contributes but bravo for bravo, I'm pretty sure NYC is busier than Chicago.
Here is the big secret: file two flight plans .... MSN to DPA then DPA to MIE. When you check in with Chicago approach, say "we have an IFR on file off DPA to MIE and we'd like to pick it up in the air now".
"Roger, cleared to MIE via vectors EON, as filed..."
The controller on 133.5 probably won't care, but if he asks why, an answer like "schedule change" will do just fine. Having the next leg of the flight sitting there at the scope will make it almost seamless. And if you have to pee, just land at DPA.
Seems like you would be happy with your clearance..??
Ahh, the Midwest version of the "Salinas Subterfuge".
Is KDPA the best airport to file to? KPWK and KMDW are much closer to the desired route...
But if we can do this trick, why can't we just get an equivalent clearance through?
Another frequently used trick is to just fly down the shoreline VFR and pick up a clearance in the air off GYY...WX permitting, it saves from having to go either 20 west of ORD or 10 miles off the lake shore to get around ORD.