Brad Z
Final Approach
For those of you IFR folks who are still trying to figure out BasicMed, this DP was recently published in the latest edition of FAA Safety Briefing Magazine:
What fun would that be?Oh, how cute.
A simple flow chart would have been much better.
Get a female doctor. It makes that part of the exam more... enjoyable.So, not to be "that guy" but I just did BasicMed and it was the easiest process imaginable.
Step 1: See doctor and let him fondle your balls
Step 2: Take AOPA's class and learn all about how important it is to get a good night's sleep before flying.
Done
That has nothing to do with the push and everything to do with the way Congress wrote it. It was written to allow people to act as pilot in command. The issue of acting as a different required crewmember was missed by everyone.Now that it is in, AOPA is pulling another GOTCHA ---- telling you to be wary if you log time as a Safety. Supposedly illegal to as as SIC with BasicMed ---- they nicely avoided that while pushing for BasicMed
To be accurate, it wasn't designed by the FAA. It was designed by Congress. And it seems to me I've heard the word "bug" used now and then in things I'm pretty sure were designed by "software people.Imcomplete. Obviously designed by the FAA and not a software person.
I think he's talking about the flow chart.To be accurate, it wasn't designed by the FAA. It was designed by Congress. And it seems to me I've heard the word "bug" used now and then in things I'm pretty sure were designed by "software people.
Imcomplete. Obviously designed by the FAA and not a software person.
You found the easter egg.The Morse made me chuckle. Heh.
Get 3rd class by pass
Ah, I missed that. I thought it was the design of the safety pilot glitch.I think he's talking about the flow chart.
A safety pilot must be acting as PIC in order to log PIC time. There are situations in which the safety pilot cannot act as PIC. Some are regulatory, others practical.Why would you log SIC as a safety?
Shouldn't both be logging PIc?