Piloto
Line Up and Wait
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2011
- Messages
- 989
- Display Name
Display name:
Piloto
As everyone has noticed AVGAS price has been steadily increasing. I can see that by 2020 average price will be over $10/gal. Here are some cost calculation I made for different types at $10/gal
Engine type Cost per hour Cost per year (100 hours)
200hp $100 $200 twin $10,000 $20,000 twin
200hp Turbo $140 $280 twin $14,000 $28,000 twin
300hp $150 $300 twin $15,000 $30,000 twin
300hp Turbo $200 $400 twin $20,000 $40,000 twin
Me and others have noticed a significant reduction on piston plane activity at the airports. Unlike on previous decades I no longer see hangar activity or singles on the run up area. Most of the time I am the only single on the run up area. And I have to justify every flight. With the above numbers I can see the impact on GA planes.
Only those high efficient (nm/gal) planes will be able to survive the AVGAS rising cost. I am lucky to own a Mooney M20J that does 17.5nm/gal (20mi/gal) vs my SUV that does 18 mi/gal. But my hangar neighbor owns a 601P that does 5nm/gal. For the same number of hours in a year he pays an extra $30,000 and does not get any quicker than my 201 due to the preflight time taken by the 601P. With $30,000 I can stay at La Quinta for one year or just buy a new car. Not to mention the yearly maintenance/insurance cost of the 601P.
Like on the airliners the new GA performance spec to beat will not be speed but nm/gal by seat.
Comments on the above are welcome
José
Engine type Cost per hour Cost per year (100 hours)
200hp $100 $200 twin $10,000 $20,000 twin
200hp Turbo $140 $280 twin $14,000 $28,000 twin
300hp $150 $300 twin $15,000 $30,000 twin
300hp Turbo $200 $400 twin $20,000 $40,000 twin
Me and others have noticed a significant reduction on piston plane activity at the airports. Unlike on previous decades I no longer see hangar activity or singles on the run up area. Most of the time I am the only single on the run up area. And I have to justify every flight. With the above numbers I can see the impact on GA planes.
Only those high efficient (nm/gal) planes will be able to survive the AVGAS rising cost. I am lucky to own a Mooney M20J that does 17.5nm/gal (20mi/gal) vs my SUV that does 18 mi/gal. But my hangar neighbor owns a 601P that does 5nm/gal. For the same number of hours in a year he pays an extra $30,000 and does not get any quicker than my 201 due to the preflight time taken by the 601P. With $30,000 I can stay at La Quinta for one year or just buy a new car. Not to mention the yearly maintenance/insurance cost of the 601P.
Like on the airliners the new GA performance spec to beat will not be speed but nm/gal by seat.
Comments on the above are welcome
José