PaulMillner
Line Up and Wait
perhaps, but none of that has anything to do with ethanol. Ethanol is all about money and politics under the guise of protecting the environment, and avgas is just a lot of lead which was supposed to be ruining the environment anyway. Both fuels are garbage in my book. Cars get less mileage with ethanol so you got to burn more of it.
Perhaps what, Scott? To what are you referring?
Ethanol and other oxygenates started out making sense, when 1980's cars were on the road that would burn leaner with oxygenates in the fuel. Come the 90's and addition of oxygen sensors to the exhaust system, and the computer began compensating-out any such benefits.
THEN ethanol became an artifact of where the first presidential primary is every four years, corn-growing Iowa!
Lead has been the only way we could meet the avgas spec... it was GAMI's work that showed the 1930's empirical basis for the avgas spec was flawed, given modern fuel manufacturing processes... and that it *could* be possible to meet the needs of the engines while slightly modifying the spec. The FAA's struggle to wrap their heads around that has been the Sisyphean labor of the past decade...