I always seem to have a long list. I’m hoping that once my A&P finishes putting his kids through college, my annuals will be less expensive.
LOL. I do my annuals early in the year, when we are still snowbound here. I keep saying I expect my mechanic to be driving a new Jaguar come summer, and everyone will know who paid for it.
My annual inspection typically run me $2-2.5k every year plus any upgrades I do. So yesterday I get a call from MX and they have 22 line items to review. What they found absolutely shocked me. Either my old MX was blind, didn’t care or was trying to kilt me.
All in, I’m at $6k and that is with a couple deferred items. I just about lost my lunch. I was planning on doing some avionics by summer, but gaaadddam man this takes a bite outa that...
I am assuming your
annual inspection cost was still the typical $2.5k, and it's repairing some of the stuff they found that ran the cost up?
I’m just a regular joe trying to live a ballers lifestyle. Owned a plane since 2014 and this was the first time I got hammered in annual. It’s a new shop to me....
Did the new shop find genuine safety related things that had previously not been noted? Or was much of it purely discretionary, difference of opinion between different mechanics (not like we haven't seen a bunch of that from the mechanics that post on PoA
).
A new shop is always going to find "something." Whether it's truly legit/critical is another matter. One A&P can look at something and say "it's fine." Another might look at it and say "replace it now or you're going to die." In my experience, the first guy is more likely to be right (and the second guy probably works for a bigger shop). Not always the case, but frequently.
I agree with you, except for the bolded sentence. My experience is the opposite, but how that type of news is received and interpreted may have a lot to do with differences between owners approach to their planes.
I like to have a "new set of eyes" look at the plane every few years as I think they will find stuff the last guy might have been sort of blind to. I deliberately have my Husky being maintained by a different shop than my Aztec for that reason. When it comes to maintenance, mechanics and shops will vary in their approach, just like we airplane owners are all different in our views towards our own airplanes. And that's compounded by the fact the whole fleet is aging and most of us (and our mechanics) are dealing with decades old airplanes.
That sets up for a lot of age related maintenance issues, which can lead to many discretionary airworthiness maintenance recommendations..."
Are these hoses acceptable to make it to the next annual?" sort of thing.
"Are the stop drilled cracks in the baffling okay for another year, or is this the year its finally time to take it apart and repair?" - one mechanic will say okay to keep deferring, another may recommend repair to avoid a potential failure. One owner will change out only the hoses that must be changed and defer the remainder, another owner will change out the entire set. There's no right or wrong about that sort of thing - both approaches work.
When you buy an old airplane you might be getting a cream-puff from a obsessive-compulsive seller (who changes out all the hoses, for example), or you might be getting one that is perfectly safe to fly, but still has age related deferred maintenance that you need to keep an eye on, and will in due time cost money to fix. Check out this thread to see how one of our members approaches his plane:
https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/skywagon-year-in-review.117795/