A friend of mine was going to give up flying as his AME told him he had an irregular heart beat. I told him, "Not so fast" ... I'm in medical imaging and know a bunch of great cardiologists. Long story short, cardiologists cleared him after a couple of months of paperwork, EKG, Echocardiogram ... he thought and was told by his original AME it was doubtful he would ever fly again. He has a benign positional irregular rhythm. I helped another guy that was told "abnormal EKG" ... the leads weren't placed correctly on the original EKG exam. Don't let anyone place leads on you that isn't a heart specialist.
Yeah, I don't either. I just don't pretend to be an Internet badass.I don't live my life huddled in a corner fearing the SOBs of the world.
Try it.
What makes you think he is afraid to speak his mind. It sounds to me like he is recommending being prudent, level headed, and being mindful of possible litigation. That isn't cowering in fear and it doesn't make our country pathetic.Correct, you're afraid to speak your mind, what a pathetic country we have become when speaking the truth is considered being a "bad ass"
Hope posting his name doesn't somehow come back to bite me so I'll say this.... This is merely my own experience and opinion. The AME is T_ J_ out of Milwaukee, WI.
One airman against CAMA and the AMA. Good luck with that. You'd be better off moving forward with your life and stop dwelling on problems already solved.
Is there any formal complaint one can file on AME's?
May be a wasted effort, but this is an example of what's wrong with this country today. People afraid to challenge powerful groups or those in power who behave badly. A big reason for Trump's success. IMO.
You have your medical. Be thankful and move on. Getting frustrated is letting him win.
One airman against CAMA and the AMA. Good luck with that. You'd be better off moving forward with your life and stop dwelling on problems already resolved.
It's easy to be brave when advising someone else to fight the battle.May be a wasted effort, but this is an example of what's wrong with this country today. People afraid to challenge powerful groups or those in power who behave badly. A big reason for Trump's success. IMO.
Unless he canceled at the last minute, a patient has every right to cancel and go to another doctor.The thing to learn here is to not initiate and cancel an appointment like he did.
Only problem I have with what allegedly went down is that he claimed the applicant was going to lie to another AME or on another application. That was just wrong. He should not be able to make that claim, that was out of line. (unless some other dialog went on that we aren't aware of) Even if he had said he was going to another AME I doubt he said he was going to lie to another AME. Perhaps if the exchange had ended with 'ok, I know what you need from me to issue' and just never go back. vs. Telling him, I'll go to someone else. He wouldn't know if you decided to just go sport pilot or not fly or whatever, and maybe not felt obligated to raise a flag.A doctor makes a report of what he deems a suspicious cancellation and the FAA responded with a simple investigation. No harm, no foul. Maybe he should sue the FAA?
The thing to learn here is to not initiate and cancel an appointment like he did.
It's easy to be brave when advising someone else to fight the battle.
I'd be seeking damages from the AME for the cost of exams, lost pay, general aggravation due to his malpractice.Once my Doc's nurse was taking a third EKG on me and I asked Doc WTF is going on. He said that it was showing I had had a heart attack. What wouldn't I know? He said not necessarily. Well he grounds me, I call the airline and Chief Pilot about it and got released from 4 days of flying (aww). Doc had me scheduled to see a cardiologist on the following Monday (this was on Thur). So the next few days every time I felt something I was paranoid I was having a heart attack. So Mon comes and I undergo a nuclear stress tests and a scan of my heart. A cardiologist that was a local pilot looked at my EKG from Doc's office and said there was nothing wrong with my heart. Finally the scan didn't show anything and I was good to go. So danhagan is correct!
This. But everyone has their own risk/reward decision to make.I pick my battles and for me, this one isn't worth fighting. If I did choose to challenge this, I would do it quietly with the help of a capable attorney and rather than exposing myself to potential legal problems by going public with his name. If this had caused me real damage, it might be different.
Until you went to a lawyer and he told you that you have no case because part of the AME's job is to report potentially "unsafe" pilots. Yes, the AME may have been ****ed off due to OP going to a different doctor, and that may have been part of the reason for the letter he wrote, but in the end he can claim it was for safety. Case dismissed. Thanks for stopping by.I'd be seeking damages from the AME for the cost of exams, lost pay, general aggravation due to his malpractice.
I was responding to post #42.Until you went to a lawyer and he told you that you have no case because part of the AME's job is to report potentially "unsafe" pilots. Yes, the AME may have been ****ed off due to OP going to a different doctor, and that may have been part of the reason for the letter he wrote, but in the end he can claim it was for safety. Case dismissed. Thanks for stopping by.
Why waste any more time and energy on this a-hole. Let it go and move on to more positive things.
It's easy to minimize the risks faced by others.Brave? It's not like it's a gun battle to the death, were talking about leaving the guy a bad review or maybe writing a letter to the FAA.
Who was damaged and what were the damages? This is truly a silly discussion. The OP should go visit a lawyer so the lawyer can tell him to pull up his big boy pants and move on.
I agree that he has the right to question it, but it's his choice to make as to whether and how far to take it, and I think it's unfair for people who are not in a position to suffer any consequences to criticize him for whatever choice he makes.The OP wrote that the examiner wrote two untruths in his report to the feds. He has a right to question that, and hopefully have that part removed. I would too. Maybe you wouldn't but that's your deal.
I agree that he has the right to fight that battle, but it's his choice to make, and I think it's unfair for people who are not in a position to suffer any consequences to criticize him for whatever choice he makes.
Who was damaged and what were the damages?
It's easy to minimize the risks faced by others.
Believe it or not, I agree with you here James. I could be way off base, but I think putting a review on Yelp or airnav etc. is acceptable and you can argue that it is just that, a review. Lighting the guy up on a message board (even if he may deserve it) is taking a bigger risk. There are sites to review doctors, that would be appropriate.You and I have a different definition of "risk" I think.
Leaving bad reviews for someone giving crap service isn't something I consider risk, just called being a consumer.
What the difference between leaving a review of poor service on Yelp, google, or POA?