- Joined
- Sep 19, 2005
- Messages
- 9,486
- Display Name
Display name:
Pilawt
Why an EAB Citabria clone and not something interesting? Say, a Hiperbipe? Acro and a degree of cross country capability for two.
FWIW I really wish someone made an EAB that was a Citabria clone in the same manner that so many companies make EAB Cub clones...
Sigh. I would give up a kidney for an experimental Citabria if it didn't cost me my medical
That seems to be what some people were axing for. I was just wondering why.EAB Citabria clone?
FWIW I really wish someone made an EAB that was a Citabria clone in the same manner that so many companies make EAB Cub clones...
The Christavia is close: https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/kitspages/christaviaMK1MK2.phpFWIW I really wish someone made an EAB that was a Citabria clone in the same manner that so many companies make EAB Cub clones...
I don't hate the hiperbipe that's for sure. Ironically, one of the Sorrells is in my Citabria log books. He did a bunch of welding after someone wrecked the gear.Why an EAB Citabria clone and not something interesting? Say, a Hiperbipe? Acro and a degree of cross country capability for two.
That seems to be what some people were axing for. I was just wondering why.
I got a healthy dose of it when I taxiied my Citabria onto Embry Riddle's ramp in Daytona. It was arranged with the school, as I had a meeting there, but the students couldn't figure out why someone would WANT to fly something like that.
Easy. If my Citabria were experimental I could do the fabric myself. I could choose lighter components, choose modern lights, electronics and even ignition from this century.
I also wouldn't be trying to locate paperwork for the spades I have but can't install without permission from the King.
EAB Citabria clone?
I got a healthy dose of it when I taxiied my Citabria onto Embry Riddle's ramp in Daytona. It was arranged with the school, as I had a meeting there, but the students couldn't figure out why someone would WANT to fly something like that.
well I was 20 hrs into my ppl flying a 172S, when i decided to do some extra credit and also work on tail dragger. Saturday I flew 2.2 hrs with Joy at Texas Tail Draggers and within 5 minutes of being airborn I was hooked. I absolutely love flying that plane. Sunday I soloed the 172 in the pattern for 1.2 hrs. The plane I once thought was fun to fly now feels like an old mini van.
This. I’ve sort of tossed the idea of ever owning a Part 23 aircraft. Things like fabric work are things I know I could learn to do and I’d want to be able to do that, avionics upgrades, and the like without having to worry about STC’s and paying an AP to do it. Plus the cost of certified parts. It’s kind of depressing really because a Citabria pretty much checks all the boxes I’d want in a plane.
Hard to beat the view in a big old biplane!
Well, ... if the Citabria did it for you, just wait till you push the throttle up on an Extra 330L. -Holy cr@p! Got 1 hour in one last week, and I'm thinking of starting a "gofundme" account.
Back in the early days of the "Front porch of Aviation", aka PoA, there was a very generous guy named Chip who owned a 330L and used to hang out here. Several years in a row he spent nearly the entire Gastons weekend giving endless rides to those who were interested. THAT was an "E" ticket ride!
Here his is getting ready to give a ride to Toby, another person now long gone from the Front Porch:
Now go climb in a Pitts... It will make that Extra feel boring. Nothing quite like a biplane.
I've got plenty of time in SuperCub's/Carbon Cubs. I'll take a Citabria/Scout any and every day of the week over a cub.Go fly a Supercub. The Citabria will be forgotten.
Go fly a Supercub. The Citabria will be forgotten.
A Scout is in the exact same alley as a supercub. Supercubs can do one thing well... takeoff and land short. But the control harmony is just garbage, the plane is uncomfortable and not very easy to get into or out of or load things well. The Scout can takeoff and land nearly as short and excels in the previous things I mentioned.Citabrias do a lot of things not very well. I prefer a plane that shines at the mission. You must have different priorities, and that's why there are more than one kind of airplane.
Citabrias do a lot of things not very well.
A Scout is in the exact same alley as a supercub. Supercubs can do one thing well... takeoff and land short. But the control harmony is just garbage, the plane is uncomfortable and not very easy to get into or out of or load things well.
I flew serial number 4 (30004). It was lighter than a 172 from 20 years later, and had Horton STOL on it. What a performer.You aren't ruined forever until you've flown a Cessna 180.
That's the other thing... Supposedly a lot of people don't think that Citabrias are pretty aircraft. I think they're beautiful.Looks like a clone of my second Citabria, a 7GCBC, a 1966 IIRC:
First was a 1976 7ECA:
I'm actually considering putting a Citabria on floats. My only reservation is the wood spar thing.
Put a Citabria on floats and it's not any more aerobatic ...