Airworthy?
- Thread starter timwinters
- Start date
AdamZ
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2005
- Messages
- 14,869
- Location
- Montgomery County PA
- Display Name
Display name:
Adam Zucker
Not an engineer so not qualified to say but looks way to wrinkled for my comfort. I can picture this thing folding over.
RotorAndWing
Final Approach
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,496
- Location
- Other side of the world
- Display Name
Display name:
Rotor&Wing
The side of the empennage on a local Ercoupe. It was initially damaged when a hangar collapsed on it and appears to have simply been "beat back out" into shape.
The damage is on one side only.
Considering the monocoque construction...is this airworthy?
My initial answer would be "no".
Geico266
Touchdown! Greaser!
You would have to look and see if the ribs or bulkheads are distorted in any way.That is just skin right?
Has it flown after the "repair"?
Any entry in the log book on the damage or repair?
Has it flown after the "repair"?
Any entry in the log book on the damage or repair?
Last edited:
Checkout_my_Six
Touchdown! Greaser!
how does it fly?
It would require an inspection by a DER to make that determination. Personally I would not fly it until one signed off on it, to many creases for my liking.
Checkout_my_Six
Touchdown! Greaser!
No....an IA can make that determination. If he determined that a repair is required....the DER could approve the repair data if it differs from the TC data.
Last edited:
There is no 'just' skin in a monocoque construction, every skin, frame, and rivet is a structural component that all work in harmony to provide great strength at low weight. If there was a 4130 tube frame that had been skinned for aerodynamics, it wouldn't be a problem, but that is not the case I believe.
rbridges
En-Route
bnt83
Final Approach
The side of the empennage on a local Ercoupe. It was initially damaged when a hangar collapsed on it and appears to have simply been "beat back out" into shape.
The damage is on one side only.
Considering the monocoque construction...is this airworthy?
Looks like the rivet heads are nearly sanded off too.
couldn't you just nail a couple of 2x4's longways down the frame to add rigidity?
You laugh, and the 2x4s wouldn't do it, however if I needed to brace a fuselage like that to get my sorry ass out of somewhere and back home, building an internal frame out of lumber to provide support would be my option.
Unless there is a specific allowance in the service manual for such damage, then it is not airworthy. And I highly doubt there is any allowable damage section in the manual for any plane from that era.
Time for a repair. And Henning is correct... it is semi-monocoque construction which means the skin is indeed structural, and must resist all kinds of applied loads, including those that would cause the skin to buckle. Skin that is wrinkled/dented like that will have far, far less resistance to buckling and that is why it must be repaired.
Time for a repair. And Henning is correct... it is semi-monocoque construction which means the skin is indeed structural, and must resist all kinds of applied loads, including those that would cause the skin to buckle. Skin that is wrinkled/dented like that will have far, far less resistance to buckling and that is why it must be repaired.
timwinters
Ejection Handle Pulled
yeah, I'm glad Henning this said it...Larry doesn't understand how the skin is important to monocoque construction? Interesting.
I think an IA can determine that it's not airworthy, but unless there is guidance with regards to tolerated damage, it would require a DER to determine it is airworthy.
RotorAndWing
Final Approach
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,496
- Location
- Other side of the world
- Display Name
Display name:
Rotor&Wing
Jaybird180
Final Approach
Perhaps a dictionary would be in order to learn what he meant when referring to it as "monocoque?.
[edit] ooops, I see now that Henning already beat you up about it in post #8
Checkout_my_Six
Touchdown! Greaser!
in kind....an IA can also call it good...with their signature.
A DER is not an inspector.....they approve data.
What's missing here are additional photos. How do we know that's not a wheel fairing?
Last edited:
RotorAndWing
Final Approach
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,496
- Location
- Other side of the world
- Display Name
Display name:
Rotor&Wing
in kind....they can also call it good...with their signature.
A DER is not an inspector.....they approve data.
What's missing here are additional photos. How do we know that's not a wheel fairing?
I've never seen a wheel fairing with a tie down ring........
Checkout_my_Six
Touchdown! Greaser!
well ya....but.
Geico266
Touchdown! Greaser!
Wow! Ya think?
A wrinkled skin doesn't mean the plane is not airworthy. Design of airplane structures also involves redundancy and engineering margins.
The question was asked is the plane airworthy, but obviously he was looking to start a ****ing match.
Last edited:
Geico266
Touchdown! Greaser!
I'm not the least bit surprised about that.
Wow, the little girls club is in full attack mode!
How many airplanes have you girls built?
How many airplanes have you girls repaired?
Wow, Little Timmy I thought you were looking for advice, but I see now you just wanted to do a little "show and tell" like kindergarten.
Last edited:
RotorAndWing
Final Approach
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,496
- Location
- Other side of the world
- Display Name
Display name:
Rotor&Wing
Geico266
Touchdown! Greaser!
About 40 years worth.
And I know what a monocoque fuselage is.
You've built 40 years worth of planes, got it.
So a wrinkled skin is cause for the plane to be unairworthy ever time? No amount of damage is acceptable?
I'll wait for the other girls to catch up.
Last edited:
RotorAndWing
Final Approach
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,496
- Location
- Other side of the world
- Display Name
Display name:
Rotor&Wing
You've built 40 years worth of planes, got it.
So a wrinkled skin is cause for the plane to be unairworthy ever time?
In monocoque construction the aircraft skin carries part of the load. Wrinkles in a skin has weakened the structure.
And to answer your question, I've worked on aircraft for the past 40 years, earned an A&P, an IA. I've also rebuilt several airplanes as well as helicopters.
Geico266
Touchdown! Greaser!
You are ducking the question as usual.
So any wrinkle in the skin of an aircraft is cause for it to be grounded and the skin replaced is that your assertion? A simple yes or no, pretty simple really.
Last edited:
RotorAndWing
Final Approach
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,496
- Location
- Other side of the world
- Display Name
Display name:
Rotor&Wing
I answered your question.
As an IA, if I had a question to the extent of the wrinkles, I would either consult the manufacturer or a DER for further determination.
As to the picture of the thread, with that much wrinkling I would not fly it.
Geico266
Touchdown! Greaser!
He didn't ask if you would fly it, he asked is it "airworthy". You do know the difference right?
I asked if the plane had been flown since the repair, and was the repair in the log book.
Would you rethink your position about flying the plane knowing the "repair" was logged in the log book and approved by the manufacturer?
You based your professional opinion and 40 years of aircraft building experience on one photograph?
RotorAndWing
Final Approach
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,496
- Location
- Other side of the world
- Display Name
Display name:
Rotor&Wing
I know you have difficulty with reading comprehension, so please go back and read each post carefully and slowly.
Geico266
Touchdown! Greaser!
RotorAndWing
Final Approach
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,496
- Location
- Other side of the world
- Display Name
Display name:
Rotor&Wing
When all else fails belittle the person winning. Got it.
Time for your nap.
Bye Larry........
Wow! Ya think?
A wrinkled skin doesn't mean the plane is not airworthy. Design of airplane structures also involves redundancy and engineering margins.
The question was asked is the plane airworthy, but obviously he was looking to start a ****ing match.
A wrinkle and a crease have very different physical properties, and that skin has a bunch of creases in it. You are welcome to fly it if you believe it is safe, I would not though.
I wouldn't dismiss the wrinkles out of hand, but not being able to see if there are any damages inside the empenage I'm not going to make a determination based on an internet forum photo.
If there is no guidance from the manufacturer with regards to damage allowance, that airplane is unairworthy from a legal standpoint.
I would, that metal is creased so it has next to no strength in the dimension required of it, it may hold through mild conditions but a good dose of turbulence could easy buckle the empennage.
timwinters
Ejection Handle Pulled
Not at all, people gave opinions with valid back-up. Then you gave your's, with none.
Wow, the little girls club is in full attack mode!
How many airplanes have you girls built?
How many airplanes have you girls repaired?
Wow, Little Timmy I thought you were looking for advice, but I see now you just wanted to do a little "show and tell" like kindergarten.
And then, when proven wrong, Larry goes into full attack mode like...should I say it?...a little kindergarten girl.
Enjoy life Larry!
RotorAndWing
Final Approach
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,496
- Location
- Other side of the world
- Display Name
Display name:
Rotor&Wing
I agree Norman, that's why my first post I said after looking at the picture:
Then a few post later I said:
I'm basing that on just basic metallurgy, knowing an aluminum skin that carries part of the structural load has creased and wrinkled, thus weakening it.
Back in the early 90's I had a ''63 Cessna 150 with a wrinkled tail boom we were working on. In order to return it to service we had to either (a) replace the tailcone or (b) get an engineering repair from a DER.
I was also involved with a wrinkled tailcone on a Bonanza. That involved replacing the tail cone.
Last edited:
Checkout_my_Six
Touchdown! Greaser!
that's because you only have 40 years of experience.....I've never seen a wheel fairing with a tie down ring........
RotorAndWing
Final Approach
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,496
- Location
- Other side of the world
- Display Name
Display name:
Rotor&Wing
that's because you only have 40 years of experience.....
True, just a newby to this whole aviation thing......
Checkout_my_Six
Touchdown! Greaser!
yup.....just so ya know, I'm learning from your humility.True, just a newby to this whole aviation thing......
RotorAndWing
Final Approach
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,496
- Location
- Other side of the world
- Display Name
Display name:
Rotor&Wing