Curious, what type of a plane? Any reason you can't go with an F&M "pistol grip" filter? I, personally, prefer F&M because it doesn't have the hoses that the Airwolf has. They are a potential point of failure that always made me queasy.
NoYou have hoses connecting your oil cooler?
Are there any reported or systemic failures that you can point to?
The FAA is replacing AD-95-26-13, issued December 29, 1995, with a new airworthiness directive (AD 2017-14-04). AD-95-26-13 came about after numerous incidents/accidents that were caused by “rupture or failure of the oil cooler hose assemblies”
Curious, what type of a plane? Any reason you can't go with an F&M "pistol grip" filter? I, personally, prefer F&M because it doesn't have the hoses that the Airwolf has. They are a potential point of failure that always made me queasy.
I would much rather have the case mounted versions, however the O-290-D stuffed in a C120 does not leave much space between the firewall and the motor. I'm not sure it'll fit. The measurements say yes, just barely, but hard to measure for the oil filter clearance.
Tempest bought the STC and supports/builds them now.F&M is not currently in business.
There was an AD on gaskets in that application. I can't put my finger on it right now.Tempest bought the STC and supports/builds them now.
FYI, For the F&M/Tempest oil filter adapters there are a couple threads (on BeechTalk/CPS/C172 forums) of oil loss due to failure of the new-ish style fiber gasket between the engine case and oil filter adapter.
??I can't put my finger on it right now.
Thanks for posting!