rwellner98
Cleared for Takeoff
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 1,454
- Display Name
Display name:
rw2
That was probably 20 prompts down the rabbit holeI think it’s pretty spot on for a first attempt
That was probably 20 prompts down the rabbit holeI think it’s pretty spot on for a first attempt
(my emphasis)Absolutely. There's guys like my buddy who ask it a random question about quantum mechanics at dinner, then show us all the screen filled with long descriptions and mathematical formulas to "prove" that it has a PhD level understanding of quantum physics. Doesn't matter than he has zero chance of ever validating that the answer is correct. But some people really are convinced by just the presence of an intelligent sounding/looking answer. Dangerous!
Exactly. A simple, "I don't know the answer to that", or maybe, "I don't have enough information yet to answer that" would be refreshing. Hell, even Alexa will tell you that. "Hmmm... I don't know the answer to that one." An answer that may not be particularly useful to you, but it is both simple and correct.One of the major issues that needs to be worked out with these models is that they don't seem to be able to simply say "I don't know". They are currently designed so that they have to give an answer, with the confidence of a politician or mid-level corporate manager, regardless of its accuracy.
. . . . AI is not Intelligent. Its basically a search algorithm. It has to classify volumes of information and then is a comparison of new data to the old . . .