@Ryanb , I think you have introduced an new interpretation of “holding out” into the Part 91 vs. 135.
...and probably sounded the death knell for the mile high club at the same time.
A hypothetical - Legal or not?
- Thread starter RyanB
- Start date
...and probably sounded the death knell for the mile high club at the same time.
Lindberg
Final Approach
Does something on the OP's question indicate he is not paying the costs of operating the aircraft?
MauleSkinner
Touchdown! Greaser!
See my signature line.
Lindberg
Final Approach
I can't.
For those who failed to catch the sarcasm, this thread is a joke!
- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Messages
- 20,703
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Display Name
Display name:
Snorting his way across the USA
Let's say you are a PPL and you take your friend 49 NM away due north to another airport to meet up with a CPL, who will fly 51 NM from a direction due south of your destination. Your airspeeds are 110 kts and 160 kts respectively. You have determined that your flight has communality, and the other conjugality.
Which one of you will experience the most lateral drift due to the Coriolis effect?
Which one of you will experience the most lateral drift due to the Coriolis effect?
- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Messages
- 20,703
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Display Name
Display name:
Snorting his way across the USA
For the win!
bflynn
Final Approach
It was a side example, unrelated to the OP's situation. I think we've pretty well established that compensation has occurred and I have already written a report for the FSDO. All I need now is for someone to joke about flight instruction and it will get fired off.
Which joke do you want?
MauleSkinner
Touchdown! Greaser!
Three flight instructors walk into a bar...
Nope. It was a Cessna trailing edge. Never mind.