poadeleted20
Deleted
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 31,250
It would indeed. That's why I wanted to review the situation -- in case I missed a detail.It's an Aerostar, so that would need to be AMEL instead.
It would indeed. That's why I wanted to review the situation -- in case I missed a detail.It's an Aerostar, so that would need to be AMEL instead.
I suppose if you wanted to be really careful, you might either change one engine and test fly it before changing the other, or get the two engines overhauled by two different shops, but...
14 CFR 91.407(b) -- and I already did that several posts up.(can't find the return to service test flight in the regs this morning, btw someone with greater skills than I will have to cover that detail)
My plane has had engine overhauls and has been in the shop for over 4 months now. The day is getting closer to test flights. Problem is I haven't flown for more than 2 months, and by the time it's all ready to go, it will be over 90 days. I'd like to take my mechanic up for the first flight, so that he can help me monitor any anomalies etc. Is there any proviso for a certified A&P to come along in this scenario, or is he regarded as just a passenger and I need to go do 3 takeoffs and landings before he can come along?
I thought that at first as well, but then I reviewed the reg.
It's aircraft category and class. The category is "normal" or "utility." The class is "airplane."
Both a 172 and an Aerostar are the same at that level.
Now, for airmen, a different certificate is required for the two aircraft.
See 14 CFR 61.57(b)(ii).