- Joined
- Dec 8, 2023
- Messages
- 363
- Location
- Houston & SE Wisconsin
- Display Name
Display name:
StraightnLevel
...
Last edited:
Most umbrella policies excludes aviation. We've only had one that didn't and I'm guessing it was an error.Good point - I need to check the details of my umbrella policy.
I would be very surprised if an umbrella policy covers aviation. Mine does not. I have not found one that does.Good point - I need to check the details of my umbrella policy.
Assuming someone doesn’t steal it, hail doesn’t make it look like a golf ball, or a storm does destroy it on the ground.As I'm working through my PPL, I am starting to look at what plane to purchase when I have the cert. Part of the plan has to be insurance, right?
Here's my question: Assuming that I own the plane outright (I hate the idea of borrowing money to buy toys or luxury items), what insurance do I need to carry? Not what SHOULD I carry, but what MUST I carry?
In a nutshell, if I can afford to wad it up and walk away from the smoldering wreckage, and I have other personal liability coverage, is there any legal or operational reason that I have to have insurance at all?
[For context, when I owned and drove a couple of race cars, I had to self-insure. There is no such thing as "hull coverage" for a race car; the only policy you can buy is limited to storage and transport.]
True, but then what if someone flies into your hangar, sets fire, or natural disaster destroys the hangar. Given T hangars are connected there is risks from the other tenants.Well, that's what hangars are for.
All sorts of things can happen and big cases can definitely take place against a piston driver, but the two main purposes of insurance in a liability claim are payment of defense costs and being in a position to throw easy money at the problem. A plaintiff lawyer with even a good liability claim is often faced with a choice between (a) receiving the "inadequate" policy limits now or (b) spending time, out of pocket money, energy, and other resources to win and then more time, out of pocket money, energy, and other resources to collect against a private party who will probably be bankrupt by then.Anecdotes about multimillion dollar claims in non-revenue piston (and that very much excludes leasebacks/clubs, before the usual suspects come with their outlier horror stories) exceeding policy maximums are of course not implausible, but it doesn't make carrying ye old million dollar with sublimit policies placebo.
Issue with what? Rates? Yeah, sort of. If one looks at the breakdown of an aviation insurance premium, one often discovers the liability portion is cheap but the hull expensive. So much of the driving force is hull. $250,000 hull damage claim is a $250,000 hull damage claim, but the underwriting for unintentional gear up landings can be expected to be a bit different than for an airplane where that can't happen.You are not required to have insurance. Your airport, landlord, or someone else may require it. You can fly a little and get insurance once you have more experience too. That would significantly reduce your rates. I kind of feel like it’s a waste of money but then if I have a gear up or gear collapse, then it might be worth it. If I land off airport, who pays for relocating the aircraft? I guess that would be me and I don’t think it’s cheap. Yet I heard someone hired a helicopter once to relocate their aircraft and that was a few grand, that might be the cost of your first years insurance policy or your first two years.
With that being said, does fixed gear have a better chance of not having an issue?
Until a tornado take the hangar and the plane.Well, that's what hangars are for.
All sorts of things can happen and big cases can definitely take place against a piston driver, but the two main purposes of insurance in a liability claim are payment of defense costs and being in a position to throw easy money at the problem. A plaintiff lawyer with even a good liability claim is often faced with a choice between (a) receiving the "inadequate" policy limits now or (b) spending time, out of pocket money, energy, and other resources to win and then more time, out of pocket money, energy, and other resources to collect against a private party who will probably be bankrupt by then.
Granted, I may be unknowingly speaking to a bunch of 10%ers who merely appropriate the 'upper middle' moniker for social self-preservation purposes;.....
QUINTILE | DEFINITION | MEDIAN NET WORTH |
Bottom 20% | Poverty Class | $6,030 |
Next 20% | Lower-Middle Class | $43,760 |
Middle 20% | Middle Class | $104,700 |
Next 20% | Upper-Middle Class | $201,800 |
Top 20% | Wealthy | $608,900 |
I don't think it's nihilism at all; for many pilots, it's a realization that they have significant assets that they could be putting at risk if they don't carry sufficient insurance.The nihilism about "underinsurance" is unwarranted imo.
but that's because it's very rare for a crash of a small private plane to cause millions in damages. Most crashes only damage the plane and it's occupants, with little or no damage on the ground.Most people own and fly under these "insufficient" policies without leading their dependents to destitution....
... it's no different from the race car that I wrote off at Road America in 2012. It stings a bit in the wallet, but that's a risk I can live with.
it is for a number of people. I had a friend years ago who only bought liability and accepted the risk of losing the airplane, even though it was being used to train his grandson how to fly, which at least in theory increased the risk of loss.Liability is where the real question lies (at least for me).