385hp per side, I wouldn't consider that underpowered.It's becoming more clear why the rascal is so low on price.
Is it a matter of it being under-powered for decent use or what? I get the impression the power loading is pretty bad.
385hp per side, I wouldn't consider that underpowered.It's becoming more clear why the rascal is so low on price.
Is it a matter of it being under-powered for decent use or what? I get the impression the power loading is pretty bad.
The conversion to turboprops that was in AOPA or Flying a couple of months ago looked really nifty. On the other hand, then your turning you 135K plane into a 250K+ plane, so . . .
That's what I was thinking, just in the wrong terms. "Half of useful life before overhaul" though that's obviously the wrong way to say it.No, actually, they are half TBO, for the TIO-541s, they are at normal lifes end. When it comes time to do them and the props, you're looking at a quarter of a million dollars.
At 4000' P/Alt at gross??? Heck, that's good! You won't see that out of a 340 or a 421. You might get it out of a fully modified Aerostar. I like the Duke, but would prefer an Aerostar.Why did people buy them to begin with? 125fpm on one? Yikes.
The conversion to turboprops that was in AOPA or Flying a couple of months ago looked really nifty. On the other hand, then your turning you 135K plane into a 250K+ plane, so . . .
The twin I've always wanted was one of the 5xx series Aero Commanders. I flew in one once (in the right seat, it was a charter) before I got my PPL and fell in love with it.
~ Christopher
You're off by a smidge. Two new PT6As will set you back about 600K.
LOL! Don't worry, Bruce. There are a LOT of airplanes higher on my list than a Duke.Don't be silly Ken.
Duke not like to fly.
Duke Love Hangar
Duke Love runway.
Duke detect bank account.....