Search results

your avatar reminds me of

naah, chop & drop could be chop the power then you drop, could also be a car/truck, rat ride etc.. chop & drop https://www.google.com/search?q=chop+%26+drop+rat+ride&hl=en&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwijkpfKzqzeAhXpdN8KHYt0BmcQ_AUIDigB&biw=1212&bih=922

had a quick look & i think they are available https://www.clearly.ca/thelook/how-do-multifocal-bifocal-contacts-work/

buy a new plane that turns into.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technify_Motors https://www.pprune.org/archive/index.php/t-324531.html https://www.avweb.com/blogs/insider/AVwebInsiderBlog_Thielert_FlawedEconomics_197998-1.html

per the link this covers the other part which i think means no bifocal contacts allowed ..but then

the Thielert/Centurion 1.7 was a fiasco

specs for melmoth 2 http://www.melmoth2.com/texts/Specifications.htm http://www.melmoth2.com/texts/TwoMikeUniform.htm http://www.melmoth2.com/texts/topics.htm

jim bede modded a Schweizer SGS 2-32 & went 70 hrs solo nonstop, bummer what happened to melmoth

lotsa bs out there in the contacts biz https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-357082/Contact-lens-firms-ripping-off.html

that seems to say that bifocal contacts alone are not acceptable for so contacts for far with reading glasses for up close is ok only that way, the only other alternative then is bifocal glasses

or find anything https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missing_aircraft

trillio

dillio

nilly

willy

what about just reading glasses? where no contacts are required? what's the diff? or faa rational?

look into bifocal contact lenses, dunno if they are made or available for just close-up viewing issues, the other way is easy combining the 2, contacts for far with reading glasses hanging on the beak for up close

bottom line is if you only have 1 & IT goes down or grenades vs having a spare, you then only have to worry about the downhill part