My "low-fuel burn 2 seater" will out cruise and distance a C-182 with the flaps down and I can feed my passenger and yours when we land on the fuel savings.. ;)
Those moved from Moontown a couple years ago, I've heard they went to a "private strip north of Moontown" but haven't seen them. There are also 2 at KDCU.
I didn't know asking you direct questions on your quote of a quote was trolling, but I'll assume your answer to my question is "Yes, training matters."
It's all about the mission.
What is your mission?
I don't care for beating the pattern up in a 172/182/Arrow/Cirrus. I'd rather be in something fast and maneuverable. Something slow and low. Something with multiple wings and no cockpit.
I'd say an easy 95% of my flying lately could be done...
And so many would be afraid or not care enough to clarify.
I was flying last week, Houston controller refused to call me by my proper call sign, but I kept correcting her until she shipped me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe, maybe not. I don't find it to be a d1ck statement, but if you do, that's clearly your prerogative.
If she had lived through it, posted here about her adventure, imagine the crap she would have taken......
I honestly think the line might be drawn between "professional" pilots and "hobby" pilots.
The critique style of those who fly for food is a little more direct than those who don't.
Just data mining here. Curiosity.
Not looking for "my software is longer than your software" type thread, but if you'd like to tell us how long your software is, sure, go ahead...
You posted it in an attempt to make a point, correct? The last sentence of your quote says "These mental simulations are inferential based on past experiences and training" which seems to infer that the decisions people make in high stress situations are influenced by training..