Search results

True, but most of those items are done by a CRS.

The only items requiring an IA on an engine overhaul are intergal super chargers and prop gearboxes. True.

An IA (Inspection Authorization) is an additional rating for an A&P. The IA is a designee of the FAA to perform inspections and approve certain items for return to service (simplified explanation). For your example in the OP, you need only an A&P.

Here ya go:

Here's your answer: FAA Order 8900.1, Vol 5, Ch 7, Sec 1

:yeahthat:

What really needs to be remembered here is don't get on the internet or social media and spell out everything in detail, i.e. don't bring attention to yourself. As far as legality? Well, that could go on and on and be debatable. If the FAA got wind of this (as described by the OP) then a...

Bust airspace, ignore a controller and get into a loss of separation event will do it. 709's are on the decline as the new philosophy is to do retraining.

He fails. Inspector gets reprimanded, and then he gets a 709 ride.

And I know a few that will $ign off anything a$ long as the price i$ right. :rolleyes:

PM sent

Airbus logic for not putting reversers on the outboards were for fod control, not a dissymmetry problem. Landing distance computations are done without reverse thrust factored in. Landing speeds aren't very different from other jets, the wings have spoilers and ground spoilers to dump lift...

Hi Tom, how have you been? :rolleyes: His join date is Jan 2016. It's kinda obvious who that is. :rolleyes:

Exactly. 135/121 has defined limitations.

Every checklist I've ever used has fuel verification on the before start checklist. :dunno: Guess I've just never flown that fatigued.

No way. :no:

Do you exceed limitations in the PC-12 you fly on the part 135 certificate? :rolleyes: The discussion here is a crew not exceeding a defined limitation, not how manly you are in a GA SE airplane. As a "working ATP" you should understand the difference.

You two should get a room........