Search results

Guess it just depends on who you ask. Mine is a breeze.

That they aren't wierd-looking? Oh never mind, that's the picture on the track-log page.

Hey, boy! Yeah, you! Zackly what is it that you don't you understand about "that's what I've got in it?" Which word is giving you the problem? Sheesh. :rofl: :rofl: and not only that, that's what they're selling for in Tradeaplane,, that's what it's worth to me, I know what they're worth...

Aside from that, Mrs. Lincoln . . .

Ditto, almost to the penny on all counts except a T-210 that was even heavier, and M/E training in a Snicker that was even lighter.

OK, big mouth, let's cut to the chase. What's the most money you have ever earned (salary, day rate, trip rate or whatever) during any year as a professional pilot other than as a CFI? Or include CFI if you need it, just post the number on your tax return. How many hours or days or...

And then flip one of the props to convert it to CR?:D

Interesting. Most others just want to be adopted by his parents.:D

Not many aviation jobs that are worth relocating, and many of those that might qualify are commutable. When the move occurs, it's usually because the other (non-avaition) job was the motivator.

He's not the only one.

If it were possible, sure. The maturity and aptitude that we're looking for would require your mind-read software, since there's no other way to strip back the BS. Well, except for forums like this that make it simple as pie.

Awkward entry/access issues compared to 170's but fun little planes. I had a Vag-17 for a few years, always wished it was a Pacer.

I have already changed my text enhancer's auto-response from "Dude. YGBSM" to "Gee whilllikers, a ________ for only ________! It's a beauty! " :D;) But I'll somewhat abashedly admit that I looked through TAP electronic and Barnstormer briefly last night, just to confirm the impression that...

There's no point to most of your questions, so that's no surprise.

Tangible value? You won't like that answer.

Thanks, I really hadn't looked into it further than talking to Tom Clements (the King Air guru and friend) about his plane that he likes a lot after the new engine install.

They're funny that way.

From a human interest standpoint, sure, but in most cases not for these jobs. They usually aren't ready and need an intermediate step, although some will argue that they're as good as they need to be. The problem we face is that crew experience is among the best selling points they can possess...

At which point the question of "what's the best?" will be debated. When that happens, you don't hold all the cards. The market thinks the B-models are far better than the others, as do some of the old-time owners and mechanics. You continue to maintain that the 48's are better. I don't...

Definitely for mine, absolutely no question. LF wings are a double-edge sword. Especially in shear conditions or when pilots are distracted. Whomp! I've only seen a few landing-induced bent wings in the shop for repairs, all have been Comanches. Not that C's B's and M's don't suffer some...