Search results

I've seem them for sale on FB market place....

.....and this is why we can't have nice things. ;)

I'll use it as a ring wash with kerosene....it's a good solvent.

I'm calling it a minor and logging it. If you want to SMS this and run a full blown hazard analysis....there is nil risk to this. This is the BS that frustrates most as to why folks can't do common sense maintenance on certified aircraft.

So....what is a minor alteration? and why would one be considered? ;)

Not even tempted....hope you win. ;)

What would be considered a minor alteration?

Again....landing/taxi bulbs are not approved parts.

OK....how bout this one...

So the packaging says it meets an industry standard? Bulbs for the Bonanza list a number 4313....Beech doesn't make bulbs...nor do they source an approved bulb. I can find many bulbs that have the 4313 that are filament....and LED. So, which ones as an A&P do I use? BTW....these are "tractor"...

How's this for a cross reference? https://www.larsenlights.com/par-36-led-lights

Got any references for that?....I've been discussing this with a few ACO folks. ;) I don't believe the SAE part is a requirement....and where in the 4509 does it say SAE? And show me where this is a "standard part".

Bulbs are not FAA-PMA.....that's the issue. Nor is a landing light required for part 91 ops.

Using your logic .... A GE 4313 bulb is the same as a PAR 36 bulb....so one could use any old LED PAR 36 bulb?

Does your rule also apply to landing lights? Asking for a friend. ;)

Oh....this is just the last of the surge. Prices will be back down in a few months....after the election.

Because everyone is "assuming" the tail had something to do with the inflight break up.....

Do you have data to support that? ;)

Nails it...... :yes:

Meh....maybe. I'm a sub-par pilot and think it might take a bit to lose it in my Bo. Maybe some disorientation could do it I suppose. Thankfully I have a functional autopilot to hep me out. It's probably the easiest plane I've ever flown. ;)