Air-to-Air P-40 Warhawk

Lowflynjack

Lowflynjack

En-Route
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
4,281
Display Name
Display name:
Jack Fleetwood
It was late in the morning and a very bumpy ride in the B-25, but we got it done. What an amazing airplane.

54034016469_187b041ca9_b.jpg

54034138275_db5bb4370a_b.jpg

54032816637_dcc1877c13_c.jpg

54033934833_109a04bde2_c.jpg

54033682186_0ccaf93abd_c.jpg

54032815942_55a1573cff_c.jpg

54033933693_d344bcde0e_b.jpg

54033680651_e894f2ba21_b.jpg

54034133965_67f99a2028_b.jpg
 
Beautiful. I've always liked the P40 more than the Mustang, though some might find that heresy. The P40 had better low altitude performance.
 
Jack, what lake are you shooting over? Looks familiar...
 
NordicDave said:
Beautiful. I've always liked the P40 more than the Mustang, though some might find that heresy. The P40 had better low altitude performance.
Click to expand...
It is a beautiful plane. They already had one, but bought this one because it has two seats.
 
NordicDave said:
Beautiful. I've always liked the P40 more than the Mustang, though some might find that heresy. The P40 had better low altitude performance.
Click to expand...
I think the P-40 looks more menacing and intimidating, the P-51B has a sleeker/sexier look. Good thing for us there's a world where both exist!
 
NordicDave said:
Beautiful. I've always liked the P40 more than the Mustang, though some might find that heresy. The P40 had better low altitude performance.
Click to expand...
Me too.. as a kid I built a model of the p40, the f4u was another gorgeous plane
 
Wait… did you use a B-25 as a photo platform? I am absolutely in the wrong line of work.
 
Yes, second seat, but due to the added length, the tail looks odd because the leading edges of the horizontal and vertical stabilizers are offset. The guy who sold the plane to museum told me when I asked about was it that made it look different.

It is a VERY nice P40 example.
 
Lowflynjack said:
My office!
54034354214_cb357d6448_b.jpg
Click to expand...

The B25, God & Country is one of the center pieces of the Mid America Flight Museum. It was built near the end of WWII and was used as an instrument trainer, never seeing combat. When it made it into the civilian world, it was purchased by Tallman who built a nose to replace the bombardier compartment. In the nose was a turntable with a motion picture camera mount. The nose is on display next to the airplane. There were also mounts in the rear of the aircraft. There were many movies produced with footage taken from this ship. My reading indicates that it was used in the filming of “The Memphis Bell” and many others.

It’s a beautiful, well cared for example. Like virtually all aircraft in the museum it is airworthy and gets flown frequently.
 
Lowflynjack said:
Thank you. I only use the two lenses in my signature for air-to-air. In this case, I think theses were all shot with the 70-200.
Click to expand...

….. and those two lenses and the camera are probably worn out from the use during the last week. It’s a good thing for digital photo storage and huge capacity memory cards. Jack rarely had a moment when he didn’t have the camera to his eye. If the pictures that included me didn’t break the camera I’m hoping to get a few of them.

BTW, having met Jack face to face several times now, I can tell you that he’s not only talented at this specialized photography, but he’s a great guy. He was watching out for us all as we were operating a hot ramp with active aircraft all around. At coffee call one morning I had leg cramps from not adequately hydrating the previous day. After that Jack was constantly offering and bringing me water.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top