What if you pass breathalyzer but refuce field sobriety test? And arrested.

All well and good, but in my state, you will find yourself without a driver's license.

Which state is that for the benefit of the membership?

Best thing: just don't drink, not even one, and drive. Sooooooooooooooooooo easy. And if it's not easy, you have a problem.

Good advice. Which unfortunately, did these citizens no good. They still got entangled in the legal system. I would encourage you to read what I posted.

 
Last edited:
I don't drink but what I initially learned about the DUI arrest and conviction process was so concerning I decided to do some research.

It generally seems that if you get pulled over for suspicion of DUI there is literally nothing you can do to simply drive away after the interaction.

What I've seen in my reading is the Field Sobriety Tests are difficult to pass even when sober. It is worth researching if you don't believe me. I can't say with 100 percent certainty but I think in many states the FST and the portable roadside breathalyzer tests are voluntary. The officer won't tell you that. And if you ask the officer they will likely lie to you and say they are not voluntary. Officers are legally allowed to lie to you. It is simply too risky to do these tests.

I found this quote interesting in regards to the FSTs....

"The person giving the evaluation is not medically trained. He or she only must be high school educated (diploma or GED). College-educated registered nurses, with substantial medical training, are not trusted in the medical community to give this type of neurological deficit lateral gaze nystagmus test. Hence, why in the world would you let an untrained individual use it and gather questionable “evidence” with which to later convict you of a crime?"

https://www.georgiacriminaldefense.com/blog/dui-dwi-10-reasons-not-submit-to-a-field-sobriety-test/

If you get pulled over for suspicion of DUI it is best to simply say I don't answer questions and I am using my 5th amendment right to remain silent. Politely refuse the FST. Politely refuse the portable roadside breathalyzer. This course of action is going to lead to an arrest and you will be taken to the station or hospital for chemical testing and your car will be impounded. Of course the chemical tests can't be refused without massive consequences to your medical and driver's license. Obviously, this process is not good, stressful, and you're going to need a lawyer. But realize it is highly unlikely that once you are pulled over for suspicion of DUI you will be free to go at any point of the interaction.

If you have some time search YouTube for falsely accused dui. It is unsettling to say the least. This is also a good read on the subject. https://jmurphyfirm.com/stopped-for-dui/

In my state and in many others, if you refuse BAC test your license will be suspended on the spot, and the penalties will be the same as DUI. Implied consent. Now, FST is another story

More importantly for pilots who hold any medical certificate, that becomes a much more serious problem than a DUI
 
In my state and in many others, if you refuse BAC test your license will be suspended on the spot, and the penalties will be the same as DUI. Implied consent. Now, FST is another story

More importantly for pilots who hold any medical certificate, that becomes a much more serious problem than a DUI

A portable roadside BAC test is a FST. Sometimes they are called a preliminary breath test or PBT. They are voluntary in many states. In many states it is not included in the scope of Implied Consent.
 
A portable roadside BAC test is a FST. Sometimes they are called a preliminary breath test or PBT. They are voluntary in many states. In many states it is not included in the scope of Implied Consent.

I can't speak of every state, I can only tell you that in my state you do not get a choice of the testing method. You refuse breathalyzer OR blood test, you get arrested. Without BAC number, you may beat the DUI charge, but FAA looks at this very differently. Many states do the same thing. How many, I don't know. I suspect the most
 
All well and good, but in my state, you will find yourself without a driver's license.
You cannot refuse a BAC test, and I wasn't advocating that you do. BACs are quantitative, though the accuracy of the detectors is questionable. Field sobriety tests are qualitative, unfair, and completely unnecessary. And if your state confiscates your drivers license after a refusal of FST you get to challenge them in court and win, since the law taking your license is unconstitutional. And I would challenge them in court. If we don't stick up for our rights we may as well not have them.
 
It generally seems that if you get pulled over for suspicion of DUI there is literally nothing you can do to simply drive away after the interaction.

Random anecdote from someone who has received a legitimate DUI and has also been pulled over for suspicion of DUI but has also driven away from that interaction.

I had just seen a documentary the day before about highway safety (I'm a docunerd) and there was a big section on how much research the state of TX had done on "waking up" motorists on interstates before they hit the guardrail (that was also engineered in TX, from what I remember). The fruits of that research were the rumble strips on the sides of the highways. On my way home from hanging out with a friend (it was past midnight), I was driving home, thinking about that doc and tested out the rumble strips a few times. This meant drifting over the yellow line. At my exit, I got pulled over. Given the full nine yards of the field sobriety tests. Was even asked if I knew my ABCs and could I say them backwards? Two cop cars at the stop.

I drove away. Edge case, I know.
 
Well that was infuriating to watch.
Unfortunately that is the state of our justice system, especially when you are talking about DUI offenses and relatively minor misdemeanor charges. There very clearly is a presumption of guilt. With DUI charges, at least there can be negative blood, urine, and blow tests that can exonerate you, but only after the damage is done. With other offenses the system is set up expecting a plea agreement. Lawyers don't want to go to trial. Judges do not want to go to trial, and will even threaten maximum sentencing and jail time if you have the audacity to "waste their time" by requesting your day in court and are convicted rather than accepting a plea deal. It's easy to say just don't drink or do drugs and you will be fine, until you drift out of your lane a little bit, or make a turn without using your turn signal and a LEO looking to make a DUI arrest just happens to see it.
 
Other than being shown to have zero alcohol, there's no test that will "exonerate" you. The so-called "legal limit" is only the "per se" limit where the state doesn't need to show you as intoxicated. You can be convicted at lower levels based on the officers "expert" testimony.
 
Other than being shown to have zero alcohol, there's no test that will "exonerate" you. The so-called "legal limit" is only the "per se" limit where the state doesn't need to show you as intoxicated. You can be convicted at lower levels based on the officers "expert" testimony.

I understand. I am talking about when you haven't been drinking or doing drugs and get charged with DUI. The tests will definitely exonerate you, but you are already hosed because you've been charged with DUI, your mug shot already made the jail report, your friends, family, business associates, clients, patients, and customers will all likely know or find out you were arrested for DUI without knowing it was bogus. You will likely loose your license, even though charges will be dropped eventually. You will spend thousands on an attorney, and you will have to deal with the FAA if you are a pilot. Somehow I don't think that is what we like to think our justice system is all about.
 
Looks like the scenario presented in this thread took place - to a pilot in Loveland Colorado.

Frightening.

 
Hey guys so I have a question about my recent DUI I was pulled over and had been drinking so I did the FST and then did what I thought was a breathalyzer I blew a .109 but I refused to take the Blood test. After hiring a lawyer and spending a lot of money it was later lowered to a reckless driving. Does the FAA see this as a refusal to take a BAC test even though I did the PBT? And if so what’s next? I’m not a pilot yet but I am wanting to go into a flight school to become a commercial pilot.
 
These sorts of posts begin to remind me of George Carlin's
“Suppose that you didn’t make your Easter duty and it’s Pentecost Sunday, the last day, and you’re on a ship at sea. And the chaplain goes into a coma! But you wanted to receive. And then it’s Monday, too late… But then you cross the International Date Line! Would that then be a sin then, Father?”
 
In CA FST are not mandatory, and it is your right to politely refuse to accept an invitation to submit to any or all Roadside Agility Exercises.

But I have some better advice... Uber, Lyft, sober friend, you drink-you drive-you get in trouble... no mercy here.
 
Hey guys so I have a question about my recent DUI I was pulled over and had been drinking so I did the FST and then did what I thought was a breathalyzer I blew a .109 but I refused to take the Blood test. After hiring a lawyer and spending a lot of money it was later lowered to a reckless driving. Does the FAA see this as a refusal to take a BAC test even though I did the PBT? And if so what’s next? I’m not a pilot yet but I am wanting to go into a flight school to become a commercial pilot.
You need to get all your court records and then have a consultation, not an exam, with a HIMS AME. Good idea to complete the Medxpress so that you know what other issues you might have.
 
These sorts of posts begin to remind me of George Carlin's
“Suppose that you didn’t make your Easter duty and it’s Pentecost Sunday, the last day, and you’re on a ship at sea. And the chaplain goes into a coma! But you wanted to receive. And then it’s Monday, too late… But then you cross the International Date Line! Would that then be a sin then, Father?”
I'm sure God will take that into account. Sit down, would you.
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Back
Top