LOL. Inevitable, unlikely. That statement seems contradictory.Tailspin is definitely inevitable, although unlikely.
Ok. I’ll bite.Depends on the design. My low wing experimental has no fuel pump to fail ...
If the airplane pitches down, would that be enough to restore some fuel flow and get the engine going again at least partially?You go down.
In the unlikely event this happens, the pilot simply rolls inverted to maintain fuel flow.
Surviving the subsequent wheels-up landing is the difficult part....
In the unlikely event this happens, the pilot simply rolls inverted to maintain fuel flow.
Surviving the subsequent wheels-up landing is the difficult part....
The chance of losing both in flight has an exceedingly small probability.
Everyone knows the symptoms of losing one, or the other in flight.
I was mastering the Barron and my CFI told me of a Barron incident in Maine. In dead of winter.That insidious twins vs singles debate is everywhere
Yikes! If I'm flying something with that many tanks, I'm switching them a few minutes apart from each other.I was mastering the Barron and my CFI told me of a Barron incident in Maine. In dead of winter.
Pilot did a poor job of draining ALL sumps and took off on the mains. He then switched to Aux tanks. There was a slug of water in each tank and it froze halfway to the engines. Both quit. He was able to dead stick back to his departure field.
My CFI's teaching point was, whenever possible, to switch tanks when over an airport.Yikes! If I'm flying something with that many tanks, I'm switching them a few minutes apart from each other.
Ok. I’ll bite.
What plane?Pinecone is correct. I have a gravity fed Marvel Schebler carb from a fuselage tank.
What plane?
Unless you're Denzel. Then you just fly inverted in an emergency and gravity is no longer a problem.If you lose both, my guess is you lose the engine. No gravity and I doubt enough pressure/suction.
I have 1st hand knowledge of a PA-28 caught on top IFR with an alternator failure. Battery totally died. Engine kept running OK and ended with a safe landing. On the other hand, I am familiar with the Bell Jet Ranger. It has an engine driven fuel pump plus two electric boost pumps in the fuel tank. Flight manual states that "If one or both boost pumps, inop, reduce fuel endurance to 45 minutes." Bell isn't kidding.
This Is in answer to Mandm's question: "If you lose both pumps in a low wing, would the engine still run?" I cite an example in answer, when a low wing airplane lost both pumps and continued to run. In that case, loss of the pumps would be secondary to loss of com, nav, fuel gauge, turn coordinator and ext lights.Why would you have expected the engine to not run ok in that situation?
This Is in answer to Mandm's question: "If you lose both pumps in a low wing, would the engine still run?" I cite an example in answer, when a low wing airplane lost both pumps and continued to run. In that case, loss of the pumps would be secondary to loss of com, nav, fuel gauge, turn coordinator and ext lights.
Though I was not on board the incident A/C, I was acutely aware that this was a major problem for that pilot because of the IMC conditions. Widespread low IMC over the area. Turned out OK.
This Is in answer to Mandm's question: "If you lose both pumps in a low wing, would the engine still run?" I cite an example in answer, when a low wing airplane lost both pumps and continued to run. In that case, loss of the pumps would be secondary to loss of com, nav, fuel gauge, turn coordinator and ext lights.
Though I was not on board the incident A/C, I was acutely aware that this was a major problem for that pilot because of the IMC conditions. Widespread low IMC over the area. Turned out OK.
He said, "I cite an example in answer, when a low wing airplane lost both pumps and continued to run."Still confused. There is no reason the engine should not have run normally. The electric pump is a backup to the mechanical pump and not normally used. The mechanical pump is extremely reliable.
LOL! I once had a student who was absolutely certain the engine would quit with no electrical power - he saw it as an electric fan. I needed to switch the Master off in flight to convince him otherwise. He made a little jump in his seat when I did that.I was replying to the post that stated the aircraft had a total electrical failure and the engine continued to run. In that situation it should continue to run.
LOL! I once had a student who was absolutely certain the engine would quit with no electrical power - he saw it as an electric fan.
Yep. Exactly.Once had a student wondering about that skinny little V-belt in there that made the propeller turn. He thought the alternator was a motor.