- Joined
- May 18, 2007
- Messages
- 6,809
- Display Name
Display name:
jsstevens
Or the drone pictures. I guess a restraining order reflects being impressed...The chicks. But if you really want to impress them, show them your drone pilot license
Or the drone pictures. I guess a restraining order reflects being impressed...The chicks. But if you really want to impress them, show them your drone pilot license
My ATP ride was the easiest checkride I’ve taken. AQP makes the training a breeze. I’m curious to know how others thought it was not going through a 121 or 135 program.
I think I was just very well prepared. The training department at Endeavor is great. In the 2 weeks I was in the FTDs at Delta, the few instructors I had were all great.I would not call it the easiest checkride I've taken, though mine was not AQP. The "flight" portion was also the longest at just about 4 hours, though my sim partner was also being tested at the same time (and unfortunately he didn't pass).
My ATP was in a Seminole in 1990 on a two-day ATP course at a school in Long Beach. They had HSIs and RMIs in their airplanes which made the approaches (ILS, VOR, & NDB) very easy. Being 31 years since, I don't remember very many of the details.My ATP ride was the easiest checkride I’ve taken. AQP makes the training a breeze. I’m curious to know how others thought it was not going through a 121 or 135 program.
And I am sorry about your salutation. According to the resolution passed by the Washington State Senate earlier this week, it’s officially “Go Zags”.Sorry about that. Go Cougs!!!
Sometimes that’s the best way.I can't remember much about my ATP ride, but it was in conjunction with a 6 month 135 ride with the FAA. The avionics in that KA-200 were a little weird, and I don't think the examiner really knew what was going on some of the time.
It is expensive now. I paid just south of $10k for mine. Sadly I could have done it before the new rules went into effect, but I was too shortsighted to think I'd ever want to fly for the airlines at the time. Oops I know lots of people who paid like $1500-3000 back in the day. I'm a dumb dumb.
In your defense, you were kinda busy flying other stuff back then. Heh.
And I am sorry about your salutation. According to the resolution passed by the Washington State Senate earlier this week, it’s officially “Go Zags”.
My ATP ride was the easiest checkride I’ve taken. AQP makes the training a breeze. I’m curious to know how others thought it was not going through a 121 or 135 program.
Maybe it is dependent on the DPE. My ATP check ride was very difficult, and I felt like I earned something by the end. My DPE was a stickler, staying on instruments through MDA/DA not busting quarter scale even as you pass through DA for the localizer and transition to a normal landing where the localizer is exquisitely sensitive can be a challenge in turbulence.
Yeah my oral and check ride was a full day event. I believe I started at 8 AM, finished at 4 PM. I didn’t have a full functioning set of avionics for any approach. Had some combination of failed instruments, which involves pulling CB’s in the Garmin, and all but one approach a failed auto pilot. And hours of flying never coming out from under the hood is fatiguing.
Am I the only one who cringed when I saw this post and thought "It's a certificate, not a rating!!!"ATP Rating
Commercial Rating
I’ve been assuming we were talking about adding a rating to the ATP certificate.Am I the only one who cringed when I saw this post and thought "It's a certificate, not a rating!!!"
I was the opposite...I was told to plan on doing my ATP checkride “tomorrow” when I hadn’t even taken the written. Obviously it didn’t work out that way.FWIW, I passed my ATP written in July 2014, and passed my ATP multi practical test on July 19, 2016. Nothing like waiting until the very last minute.
The logbook audit is done by the examiner now, as part of the qualification process at the start of the checkride...I wish the FAA was still doing it.Can’t remember what year I did mine. In the 90’s somewhere.
I do remember I needed two things just to take the written...
1) A log book check & endorsement from the FAA
2) A first class medical
Not sure what is required today.
Can’t remember what year I did mine. In the 90’s somewhere.
I do remember I needed two things just to take the written...
1) A log book check & endorsement from the FAA
2) A first class medical
Not sure what is required today.
The version I got was the pilot who had a significant amount of time in a particular Bonanza...told the inspector that the owner let him fly it whenever he wanted, to which the inspector replied, “interesting...that’s my airplane.”Yep, when I went to the FAA to get my logbook checked and the authorization for the written the ASI that signed me off told me he had a bunch of applicants come in and he kept seeing the same Baron registration number in their logs. That plane was parked behind a hangar on a local airport and hadn't flown in years, and had bushes and weeds growing around it .
Back then you took your choice of doing the written based on Part 135 or Part 121.
The version I got was the pilot who had a significant amount of time in a particular Bonanza...told the inspector that the owner let him fly it whenever he wanted, to which the inspector replied, “interesting...that’s my airplane.”
The chicks. But if you really want to impress them, show them your drone pilot license
Interesting...drone “specialist”.Nah, you have to accompany that with a drone pilot watch, preferably a Breitling Avenger.
"It was created as a reliable companion for aerial adventurers who want to achieve something outstanding and unexpected. It’s completely at home on the wrist of a drone specialist mastering the skies from the ground....."https://www.breitling.com/us-en/press-lounge/press-release/avenger-collection
Interesting...drone “specialist”.
A commercial pilot can get type ratings..........right? Probably even a private pilot.
So what extra does an ATP give you?
I can't remember much about my ATP ride, but it was in conjunction with a 6 month 135 ride with the FAA. The avionics in that KA-200 were a little weird, and I don't think the examiner really knew what was going on some of the time.
Am I the only one who cringed when I saw this post and thought "It's a certificate, not a rating!!!"
The real question is what good does a SE ATP do?? I suppose there may be some
PC-12 operators out there that require it?? But is there any FAA mandate?
Anyone here have a SE ATP? And if so, is there anything single engine specific in the ride, such as some sort of accuracy engine out landing?
That does make sense, at the same time it’s mind boggling as you still need a type rating.It gets you insured in a Cirrus Jet..
That does make sense, at the same time it’s mind boggling as you still need a type rating.
Plus that fairly new.
I am aware when type ratings are required, but certainly not all tubine aircraft require type ratings.Type ratings for Turbine aircraft are required regardless of ATP, Commercial Or Private rating.
Insurance may want to see a higher level of proficiency.
Regardless of Single or Multi Insurance and hiring requirements often trump the FAA requirements. They will however never be less.
I am aware when type ratings are required, but certainly not all tubine aircraft require type ratings.
But that really wasn’t my question.
All turbojets.I am aware when type ratings are required, but certainly not all tubine aircraft require type ratings.
But that really wasn’t my question.
I’m not sure I’m understand your question. Apply for what? Many folks have types with PPL or CPL. Perhaps I am not understanding.So if otherwise qualified, you would go ahead and apply at the commercial instrument pilot with a type rating? Instead of an ATP rated pilot for a type rating in the exact same plane on the same checkride?
Agreed. Turbojets. Not turbine aircraft. Many aircraft are turbine and not turbojet.
Perhaps you could articulate your question one more time then?I am aware when type ratings are required, but certainly not all tubine aircraft require type ratings.
But that really wasn’t my question.
Lol... I do get the confusion.Perhaps you could articulate your question one more time then?