Totally agree, surely is the way I was taught to log time.I’ve never met someone who deducts taxi time, you have to get the weather, talk to ground, do the run up. If anything, taxi time is more work than flying itself!!
Totally agree, surely is the way I was taught to log time.I’ve never met someone who deducts taxi time, you have to get the weather, talk to ground, do the run up. If anything, taxi time is more work than flying itself!!
I know what they are saying, I just don't agree that taxiing is flying. Taxiing is taxiing and flying is flying. So I log wheels up to wheels down, the time I'm actually flying. But I'm also not bound by the Hobbs, nor trying to log hours to get to some magic number. And I know why they did it the way they did, and I still don't agree with it.
L39 type rating requires 1000TT and 500 PIC… just sayinHonestly, after 500 hours TT and you have all of the certs that you want, what does it matter.
OK, L39 is on the Lottery list.Your Foreflight log is more than your Hobbs? Funny, when I rent from my flight school, their “Hobbs” is always more…
L39 type rating requires 1000TT and 500 PIC… just sayin
You don't get the weather, do run ups, or communicate at untowered fields? Okey dokey then.
If you don’t care about hours why are you arguing about how to count them?I look at the sky before climbing in the plane, so check on the weather. I'm not even in the plane.
Run up takes literally 30 seconds, check.
12345 departing runway 30, so what, 5 seconds?
No autopilot.
Why would I pay more for insurance when I already have satisfied times for part 135, and have over 700 hours in make and model?
Then by this logic.... Your takeoff roll it not flying either, your taking off, and same for your landing rollout. You should be logging wheels off to wheels on the ground. I also hope you and your biennial instructor are on the same page, It would be a shame if you didn't "fly" the entire hour............
If you don’t care about hours why are you arguing about how to count them?
Fair enough. As for me, I’m sure as hell not going to argue with the one thing they don’t break your balls about.I stated I don't agree with the FAAs stance. You brought up everything else.
Fair enough. As for me, I’m sure as hell not going to argue with the one thing they don’t break your balls about.
I think that the next plane is going to be one of those cheap fun plans that insures hate ( thinking Starduster II). Pay for liability but scrap the plane if I crash and live. Hang a remnant of the airframe on my man cave. If I crash and die, I won't be around to care.I don't think you're the one that needs to be saved.
Of course, if he wants to pay more for insurance, that's his perogative. Unless he's going pro, that's about all that it matters for anyway.
Stick around, they are just getting warmed up.You guys are a riot!! lol
Do you not pay taxes that you don’t agree you should have to?I also don't take all available deductions on my taxes because I don't agree that some of those should be deductions either.
Do you not pay taxes that you don’t agree you should have to?
It's not my number.I disagree with the FAA on that because the purpose of taxiing isn't for flying. It's for getting into a position to take off. If I taxi all over the airport for 3 hours, take one trip around the pattern, is that really 3.1 hours of flight time? No.
"But that's an absurd amount of time to just taxi around and count it for flight, you're being preposterous!!"
I say that even 0.1 is absurd. What makes your number more correct than mine?
So you don't log taxi time as flight time? Because if you do it IS your number.It's not my number.
I have rented a couple of planes in the past that ran the Hobbs whenever the master was on instead of running on oil pressure.I remember one rental where the HOBBS was about 20% higher than clock time. Great for the school and logbook but it cheated training time. The owner just smiled
Now days I just use my watch.
It's not my number because I didn't originate that interpretation of flight time. I generally do things the way I was taught unless and until I become aware of sufficient reason not to. If the FAA starts violating people for doing it that way, that will be sufficient reason. Until then, I have better things to worry about.So you don't log taxi time as flight time? Because if you do it IS your number.
Silence is compliance!It's not my number because I didn't originate that interpretation of flight time. I generally do things the way I was taught unless and until I become aware of sufficient reason not to. If the FAA starts violating people for doing it that way, that will be sufficient reason. Until then, I have better things to worry about.
Grandfather clock
I run a Stratus 3 with foreflight. My experience is that the timer engages once you achieve a certain ground speed (I.e. during take off) and the timer count is as of connection to the stratus itself (back at the ramp or wherever). As such, I don’t turn on my stratus until after engine startup. Even doing this, Hobbs is often 0.1 ahead. I do not recall how much of mine is based on user configurable settings.I don't know what algorithm Foreflight uses for this, but it's so often wrong that in my opinion can't be trusted.
My students that use Foreflight for their logbook ALWAYS seem to be at least 0.2 to 0.3 higher than the engine-running time, as determined by me through one of three methods:
1) the Hobbs, assuming it's wired to an oil pressure switch.
2) Using a watch. It's really not very challenging. 1:12 to 2:37 is 1+25, or call it 1.4.
3) Using Myflightbook, which has a superior method to Foreflight for accuracy, called "press the button to start and press it again to stop."
Foreflight is so often over-estimating the time that it seems like intentional logbook padding (whether or not you agree with @EdFred , I think EVERYONE would agree that if the engine isn't even running, it's definitely not flight time). I don't know what algorithm Foreflight uses for this, but it's so often wrong that in my opinion can't be trusted. Let alone it often tracks the walk into the FBO, drive home, your stop at the liquor store or strip club, etc. It's really terrible.
Using Myflightbook, which has a superior method to Foreflight for accuracy, called "press the button to start and press it again to stop."
I don't understand this position if we're taking about logging for ratings and currency (what you're required to log). The FAA set the definition of flight time and set the requirements for flight time based on that definition. So if you log less than allowed, you're only cheating yourself. If you think the FAA minimum times are insufficient, you can always just fly more.I stated I don't agree with the FAAs stance. You brought up everything else.
I don't understand this position if we're taking about logging for ratings and currency (what you're required to log). The FAA set the definition of flight time and set the requirements for flight time based on that definition. So if you log less than allowed, you're only cheating yourself. If you think the FAA minimum times are insufficient, you can always just fly more.