FlightmechH3
Pre-takeoff checklist
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2021
- Messages
- 149
- Display Name
Display name:
FlightmechH3
Just heard. SAR is hampered because of the bad weather.
https://patch.com/new-york/harrison/plane-goes-missing-after-takeoff-westchester-airport
That's a pretty populated area, not many places to go down without people noticing... unless it went in the lake.
That was harrowing to listen to; performance is off, but flight was continued. Not in my repertoire.
That was harrowing to listen to; performance is off, but flight was continued. Not in my repertoire.
I don’t know… Granted he had reduced power, but to me it sounded more like a poorly flown ILS. Maybe I missed some communications.
That's what I thought at first, but I think this guy was just confused as to what was going on. Sometimes it takes a few minutes to figure it out. Meanwhile he was flying the airplane. I'm promising myself that anything engine related, especially ifr, that I will declare and land. It's not worth it. The only other thing I think happened with this guy, is he got cleared to the nearby airport, but he was futzing with his avionics to get a heading rather than turning right away. I'm guilty of that too, although not while in an emergency. What I do now is ask for a heading. A significant amount of time went by flying in the wrong direction it appears. I have a great instructor who has instilled in me, first sign of emergency, get the airplane turned to an airport.
While it’s true he was not formally doing an ILS, one would think he had the localizer tuned. Yet the controller was basically trying to make the corrections for him.He never quite made it to the ILS. He was initially being vectored for that, but sounds like the engine got worse with a loss of oil pressure and power, he declared, and started getting vectors for a modified base to final with 300’ cloud bases.
While it’s true he was not formally doing an ILS, one would think he had the localizer tuned. Yet the controller was basically trying to make the corrections for him.
Obviously I don’t have all the info, and I’m not trying to belittle the task he was facing.
That said… why on God’s green Earth was he sending a text message?
Perhaps I missed it, but I didn’t hear anything about a glide. I know he said he lost a cylinder, and was losing oil pressure. I did not hear anything about complete engine failure.I agree. I think he was initially going to do the ILS but things went really south about the time he was turning for the downwind vector. From where he ended up being vectored to a base, almost direct to the airport, he was well inside any final approach fix. I’m guessing at that point it was less about aligning with the runway than it was stretching a glide to the airport. Not saying that’s right or wrong, but trying to put myself in the pilot’s mindset based on what I could gather from the tapes.
That said… why on God’s green Earth was he sending a text message?
While it’s true he was not formally doing an ILS, one would think he had the localizer tuned. Yet the controller was basically trying to make the corrections for him.
Obviously I don’t have all the info, and I’m not trying to belittle the task he was facing.
That said… why on God’s green Earth was he sending a text message?
Perhaps I missed it, but I didn’t hear anything about a glide. I know he said he lost a cylinder, and was losing oil pressure. I did not hear anything about complete engine failure.
There was a quick, muddled transmission where the controller asked him if he still had power, the guy responded, what I could make out was his prop was over speeding. This sounded well short of the FAF, and he was pretty low. He was on a downwind. The controller turned him toward the numbers and the pilot said he couldn't see anything, please keep the vectors coming. I'm doubting he had enough energy left to shoot an approach. What we don't know is if he was giving up altitude to get to the approach altitudes, that would have been a mistake IMO.
Or proper training.Another fatal that could have been prevented with a parachute.
Or proper training.
/competence
Not confirmed engine failure. I could be wrong, but seemed enough altitude to get to airport. I’m not saying fly a proper slope, but he seemed to have little clue about a localizer.Engine failure, IMC, at night. Going to need a little more than just training.
Point is, he was high enough to glide t
Not confirmed engine failure. I could be wrong, but seemed enough altitude to get to airport. I’m not saying fly a proper slope, but he seemed to have little clue about a localizer.
I have no delusions that it would be an easy task, and i certainly don’t feel the stress of what he was going through. That said, there seemed little effort to turn to the correct heading.
Again, I will re-listen, but at one point the controller just tells him to level wings. That is not a good sign.
Or proper training.
/competence
Correct to a point, but I did state several times that I don’t have all the facts. I think in a review of my posts I’ve been even handed.It's extremely pretentious and offensive of you to say that. You didn't know the pilot, and are just making a derogatory assumption.
...at one point the controller just tells him to level wings. That is not a good sign.
Dual G5s, GFC500, 530w, Insight G3.No, it is not a good sign.
I am wondering what the panel was in the plane, glass or vacuum powered steam gauges that were starting to give erroneous readings.
Or by not taking off to begin with. Thunderstorms and mist, 4 deg. C on the ground, night, single engine, low overcast. How many signs do you need?Another fatal that could have been prevented with a parachute.
To me there’s pretty much zero chance he didnt launch into known icing in a non-FIKI airplane. At night. In thunderstorms. Sure this could have happened on a clear day, but it didn’t. There seem to have been very few good decisions made here.Engine failure, IMC, at night. Going to need a little more than just training.