Posting here since this has been a hot topic here before.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...end-alcoholics-anonymous-meetings/ar-AA143iNf
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...end-alcoholics-anonymous-meetings/ar-AA143iNf
Not clear to me why united had to pay, isn’t the love of AA an FAA thing?
Not clear to me why united had to pay, isn’t the love of AA an FAA thing?
My understanding is the airlines run their own HIMS programs. It's also easier to sue a company than the Feds. Will be interesting to see if this leads to changes at the FAA, but I doubt they will change unless they are successfully sued as well.
The ones that need an abstinence based recovery group do, or did, prior to starting abstinence. Pretty silly comment.Do Buddhists drink?
2. Pulled over and arrested for being designated driver. Blood BAC, 0.0.
Time for the airlines to have their own "12-step" or similar, to prevent a costly recurrence. Time also for the FAA to remove religion-based anything from its mandates, but we'll see about that."United rejected his suggestion of using the Buddhism-based peer support group Refuge Recovery as an alternative, the commission said"
Classic, refused the breathalyzer for a blood test, so they had to arrest to get him to the station for the draw. They conjured up the reasonable doubt, which was no doubtedly the car full of drunk pilots for whom he was designated driving.
Anyhoo, had to report the arrest to his airline, HIMS reps forced him to rehab, where on the 4th week, he got the letter confirming 0.0….
And here we are…
Wait, so even after the 0.0 was confirmed he had to remain in HIMS? That's a special kind of kafkaesque nightmare.
The ones that need an abstinence based recovery group do, or did, prior to starting abstinence. Pretty silly comment.
Since you don’t know anything, a recovery group is for people doing something they don’t want to be doing.Since you don’t know anything about religion, one of the five moral precepts of the religion is to not consume intoxicating alcohol.
Since you don’t know anything about religion, one of the five moral precepts of the religion is to not consume intoxicating alcohol.
Twelve-step is highly dubious to begin with, and if you remove intense religious belief by the participant, it doesn't work at all. Studies show that as a whole twelve step is about as effective as doing NOTHING at all. The analytical studies show it only directs you away from the habit with the belief (it doesn't necessarily need to be belief in God, but it takes some deep-seated belief system to reinforce the other parts).Time for the airlines to have their own "12-step" or similar, to prevent a costly recurrence. Time also for the FAA to remove religion-based anything from its mandates, but we'll see about that.
Yep, seems to be more of a punishment, and a “we did everything we could” cya. It seems to me that random testing would be more fair and effective. I would quit flying before going to AA. Hell, I can’t imagine anything I wouldn’t choose before going to AA every day. But doing random testing, while annoying, I’d suffer through.Twelve-step is highly dubious to begin with, and if you remove intense religious belief by the participant, it doesn't work at all. Studies show that as a whole twelve step is about as effective as doing NOTHING at all. The analytical studies show it only directs you away from the habit with the belief (it doesn't necessarily need to be belief in God, but it takes some deep-seated belief system to reinforce the other parts).
Mere attendance at AA isn't going to instill a belief in God, so if that's not there it's largely a waste of time. The FAA doersn't give a damn. They see it only as a sign of the applicant doing his penance as part of the process.
They see it only as a sign of the applicant doing his penance as part of the process.