Always ON is the trend. I suspect the FAA is trying to condition people to leave them on for the benefit of controllers at airports capable of using the data.
This unless the airport uses ASDE-XPut it on stby,with proper code,switches to alt on takeoff.
Mine's on ALT and it just stays there.
One less thing to worry about ...
And less wear on the switch.
I asked the CFII who gave me my recent IPC whether or not my transponder should be set to ALT on the ground. He said "no" and wondered where I had heard that. The avionics shop who installed my GTN has the transponder programmed to switch from STBY to ALT when the groundspeed exceeds 30 kts and vice versa. Evidently avionics techs are under the same impression as the CFII.
According to this safety alert I received in an email today from the FAA, it says a transponder should ALWAYS be in the ALT position while moving on the ground at all airports.
The alert clearly says this applies to General Aviation (GA) aircraft. I just want to make sure that GA includes single engine piston aircraft in this situation. Do others interpret it that way?
http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/avia...afety/safo/all_safos/media/2015/SAFO15006.pdf
Just a reminder... There are different kinds of transponder switches. Not all are alike. At least not mine.
They all have a "off", "standby", "on", and "alt" setting.
Wherever you read that was wrong. All of the Garmin transponders do ***NOT*** respond to interrogations when in GND mode. GND is the same as standby except that it will automatically switch to ALT when the transponder determines it's not on the ground anymore.I was told on my last BFR (last year) that the FAA has changed their tune. It is now discouraged to put the transponder into stby mode... just leave it ALT all the time. I believe I read somewhere that the GTX transponders actually transmit a GND code/altitude/airspeed while in GND mode.
Speaking of this thread, is there a way to configure the Garmin 330 to stay in ""alt" mode? Mine is set to auto switch to "alt" at 30kts (I believe), but always resets back to "standby" on startup. I looked briefly at the installation manual, but I didn't see anything. It may also be an outdated manual, as my software version was updated a year or so ago.
330es manual,Wherever you read that was wrong. All of the Garmin transponders do ***NOT*** respond to interrogations when in GND mode. GND is the same as standby except that it will automatically switch to ALT when the transponder determines it's not on the ground anymore.
My c172 after landing check list say turn to standby
which was a far cry from the instant failure years ago when I took my private checkride.
Going to standby was part of my after-landing procedure throughout my training and was exactly what I did on my checkride. This was all from late 2012-2014.
I think this discussion is the first I'm hearing of it not being the correct procedure.
" all operators and pilots..." Do you see any wiggle room there for specific types of operation?
Bob Gardner
I have a 327 and it switches at 30 knots. Does anyone know if this setting can be changed to say 5 knots?
Going to standby was part of my after-landing procedure throughout my training and was exactly what I did on my checkride. This was all from late 2012-2014.
I think this discussion is the first I'm hearing of it not being the correct procedure.
The wording in the AIM regarding the use of transponders was modified last year. Regarding ground operations the AIM states: “Civil and military transponders should be turned to the “on” or normal altitude reporting position prior to moving on the airport surface to ensure the aircraft is visible to ATC surveillance systems.”
I think that the only reason that there is discussion is the way the FAA promulgated the change. It seems the word has been slowly trickling out over the last few years as evidenced by the number of CFIs and pilots who were completely unaware of the change.Why is there discussion about it?
But, the way I was trained back in 1974 is the correct way, no matter what the FAA says.The FAA needed to make a bolder announcement when introducing a change in practice that runs contrary to the way many pilots were initially trained. Think about all the guys that got their PPL 30-40 years ago and have barely cracked open the FAR/AIM since.
I would agree, but we all know the FAA is propelled by confusion, and If ever we meet remind me to discuss the call I got from the FAA this week.