Rockymountain
Pre-takeoff checklist
One day your friend calls you up, and asks if you want to get some PIC time in a Beech 18?? ;-)
Heck Yeah!!
Heck Yeah!!
Ask him why not, and if he doesn't know why not then maybe start looking for a different AME.
If he gets confused, you can send him to the FAA's website.
So, if I can hold both a basic med and 3rd class, if something comes up on the 3rd class exam, why not just exercise my flight privileges under BM. If it is a issue that would require grounding under 3rd class, why would one want to fly under BM knowing you had a grounding situation. Plus, if it is one of the grounding issues under 3rd class, I’m sure my BM doc would not sign off for me to fly.
It may not be a grounding issue per se, as much as it is the time, effort, and $$$ to show the issue is irrelevant to safety and merits a Special Issuance.
If it is a issue that would require grounding under 3rd class, why would one want to fly under BM knowing you had a grounding situation.
But if it requires a SI, it is grounding until the SI is granted.
But if it requires a SI, it is grounding until the SI is granted. For example, if you are diagnosed with OSA, you are grounded until you go through the steps for a SI, and the SI is approved. Another example, a heart issue. Don’t think the FAA wants you flying around with a heart issue until the SI is granted?
So, if I can hold both a basic med and 3rd class, if something comes up on the 3rd class exam, why not just exercise my flight privileges under BM. If it is a issue that would require grounding under 3rd class, why would one want to fly under BM knowing you had a grounding situation. Plus, if it is one of the grounding issues under 3rd class, I’m sure my BM doc would not sign off for me to fly.
Good example. OSA is really a fatigue issue and it's a back door entry for the FAA to manage it. A physician doing a Basic Med exam uses his own discretion to decide whether that poses a safety issue or not, and he doesn't need the extensive/expensive documentation checklist to make that decision.This is why some Issues require a one-time SI before Basic Med can be used, and some issues do not.
I am going on six years with BasicMed because I was tired of the SI BS associated with OSA. If I were you I would continue with the Third Class if you're sure there won't be any issues getting it. I would also get a physician to fill out and sign the BasicMed CMEC and then file it away. The BasicMed CMEC will be good for four years. If you find yourself in a situation in the future where you don't think you will pass the Third Class then you can take the online course and test and you're all set with BasicMed...
The problem is that you don't know what you don't know... every third class medical is a dance with a snake that can turn venomous!I don't see any advantages to a 3rd class given your circumstances. BasicMed and done.
BasicMed operating limitations (e.g. flying only within the U.S...
Good example. OSA is really a fatigue issue and it's a back door entry for the FAA to manage it. A physician doing a Basic Med exam uses his own discretion to decide whether that poses a safety issue or not, and he doesn't need the extensive/expensive documentation checklist to make that decision.
that's old data! Mexico and the Bahamas are on board with BasicMed, and Canada is finally coming along, at the speed of bureaucracy...
Paul
…My point in all this is what is the AME going to uncover that my personal Doctor, who I see for my annual shortly before my AME, won’t uncover. So I see no risk in maintaining the 3rd class at this point in time.
That's not accurate. If the AME opens the MedExpress, using the number you furnished him, then the alternatives are only to issue, defer, or deny. There's no walking away.If you fill out the MedExpress, there is nothing saying you actually went for the exam and were denied.
Haha! It's not like going to confession... the Third Class only requires reporting the past three years of medical visits. (Initial comparison for those of us who go to confession less often than every three years...)BM would make it tough if you get years down the road and have one of the conditions that require an SI. Reconstructing all the medical visits you've had for years as you age can be difficult and if you're active, the odds are high you'll miss something.
AOPA’s Mark Baker gave a brief update on this at Sun ‘n Fun. He says the Canadians are conceptually on board, but the administrative steps are cumbersome. It may come to pass that ICAO adopts a BasicMed option next year, and that will make it easy for Canada to come on board. Fingers crossed!AOPA claims to be working on the Canadian problem, but are they working hard enough?
...the Third Class only requires reporting the past three years of medical visits.
“A smart approach, *if* your AME will cooperate, is to print out the BasicMed so the AME has it to look at... then schedule a consultation rather than an exam. Show the AME the BasicMed data, but don't give 'em the number code. If the consultation comes out AOK, then commence the exam”
Glad you brought this approach up. My AME actually requests I bring a copy of the MedExpress file. He looks that over, asks if I have seen my PP, asks if there a were any issues, then conducts a VERY basic exam, and then goes into what he needs to to finish up the paperwork. So I guess he is doing exactly what you were suggesting.
The only pros to Class 3 are Canada, high altitude, and big airplanes. Period.my 3rd class medical expires May 31.
I'm in my mid 50s, no known issues which would preclude a 3rd class renewal.
I'm a instrument-rated PP, but I don't have any aspirations of flying commercial, or for hire. I'm fine with my piston, single-engine, four-place poking around.
Should I just bow out of the 3rd class and go basicmed now? I guess I'm having trouble putting the pros and cons in perspective.
What are your thoughts?