You have to load up and over, no? A lot harder to load 50 lb dogs into crates that way.Just curious - What don't you like about the Mooney baggage door? IMO, it works WAY better than the ones seen on most singles.
You have to load up and over, no? A lot harder to load 50 lb dogs into crates that way.Just curious - What don't you like about the Mooney baggage door? IMO, it works WAY better than the ones seen on most singles.
Hence my choice of the 36.And they never changed them on the 35s or 33s. Only the 36 (and 58).
then you should really be liking the PA-32.....Hence my choice of the 36.
I hate the yoke styles on the old Bos. Stupid thing to fixate on but that’s just me. I have to get past 1984 to get the individual yokes.
maybe he doesn't know.....they are adjustable....unlike the others.Have you flown with the throw-over yoke ?
Nope. Any issues blocking gauges?Have you flown with the throw-over yoke ?
You have to load up and over, no? A lot harder to load 50 lb dogs into crates that way.
Nope....not really.Nope. Any issues blocking gauges?
Nope. Any issues blocking gauges?
If dogs are your main mission, forget a Mooney or a Bo, you want a 206, 210 or the like, with a big square-ish cabin and giant doors to load all the crates.
If dogs aren't your main mission - IE, you're just taking your own dog with you on trips - you'll quickly appreciate how the Mooney's baggage door lets you easily fill up the entire baggage compartment, which is almost impossible to do in singles with a "normal" side baggage door since they load from the bottom.
The need for multiple dogs per trip isn’t large on the list. Although once I got 6 cats and a dog in my PA28. Thought that was pretty good. What about when I graduate to Angel flights? Easier to load people in back through the barn doors in the Bo.
It's that stupid money thing again. I can afford to buy a Bo, but not to maintain one. I can afford to maintain a RV-9, but I can't afford to build one.
Sigh....
Old school panel + ADS-B, O-320 and fixed pitch prop won't be crazy expensive to build or maintain.
A guy I know once told me that acquisition is the least expensive part of airplane ownership.I can buy an older Bo for something in the 30k range but it is an older airplane and I know from experience older airplanes will require more maintenance because things wear out. I cannot do the work so that makes my estimation of the cost to be too high.
well....after you do that...there really is no good reason for a $4,000 annual....if your mechanic checked it out before you purchase.I'm not doing it at all... yet
Nope....not really.
yup....you need the secret decoder ring to see it.That gauge in the middle sure looks blocked.
Personally, I like the V35B models. 5 seats, great climb, great cruise, nice useful load and a 17000 CIG.An A36 Bonanza is a lengthened fuselage, (allegedly) six-place, straight-tail variation of the original V-tail Bonanza built by Beechcraft.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beechcraft_Bonanza
What you are looking at is an aftermarket turbo-prop conversion that is not a Beechcraft product, but uses the A36 Beechcraft Bonanza airframe.
https://www.soloy.com/a36-bonanza.html
Or get the dual retrofit. I'm training a guy in his V35B now. Sweet ride. How's it going Brian? Happy New Year!And they never changed them on the 35s or 33s. Only the 36 (and 58).
Or get the dual retrofit. I'm training a guy in his V35B now. Sweet ride. How's it going Brian? Happy New Year!