Geico266
Touchdown! Greaser!
I like talking to myself. I'm always interested in what I have to say.
This explains a lot!
I like talking to myself. I'm always interested in what I have to say.
I like talking to myself. I'm always interested in what I have to say.
I was into electric cars way back in the 60's---- Aurora and tyco
If they would just put a pin for the slot on the Tesla(and others) and imbed conductors in the road--- battery problem solved.
Then they would be big boy "toys"
Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk claimed that the automaker requested the investigation to refute fears that electric cars were more prone to fires than other vehicles.
But the NHTSA disputed that, saying its decision was an independent process.
Tesla seems to revise some poor decisions to make them better. Tesla seems to be alluding to the possibility that there might be a problem with battery safety. It seems they have sent out a software update, that increases the ride height (road clearance) at some higher speeds. It seems that most or all tesla S have computer-controlled air suspension. Tesla seems to be copying some of the ideas from other manufacturers. Ground hugging is often better for efficiency, and sometimes helps from getting airborne, however is more likely to receive road damage. Tesla owners are already complaining about the ride characteristics that aren't quite as good at the higher settings, however the higher settings reduce the odds of striking road debris. Tesla seems to suggest that sometime in the future the company may allow customers to set their own settings.
Tesla reverses recall decision over Model S fires
Elon Musk sends out a message to the Telserati. Will change all Model S suspension settings immediately and include fires under warranty. Musk asks for NHTSA’s help with investigation.
http://www.torquenews.com/1083/tesla-reverses-recall-decision-over-model-s-fires
Increasing the ride height is not a full-blown fix, but it is a stopgap measure. Hopefully it won't cause other safety problems.
I would think that raising the ride height significantly enough to avoid road debris damage would have a negative affect on stability and economy.
Economy possibly some, but this can be overcome to a large degree by modifying the body panels. The need could also be overcome by switching to titanium from aluminum for the battery box. Stability differences would only be noticeable at the high speed end of the performance envelope and would not be drastic or unsafe in any normal usage at legally acceptable speeds. Adding an automatic copper type extinguisher to the battery box would have a minimal effect on weight and performance.
+1
I think having an automatic extinguishing device onboard would go a long way to satisfying the fire concern.
That's part of the point I'm making. You can't have everything. Raising the height significantly would also probably change the alignment. Many Tesla owners already have a problem with tire wear.I would think that raising the ride height significantly enough to avoid road debris damage would have a negative affect on stability and economy.
Tesla fanatics are such hypocrites. Tesla fanatics were so eager to point out the battery fires in Chevy Volt's crash test as a safety issue, and tout the Tesla and its battery as safe. Yet in the real world Chevy volt apparently hasn't had any battery fires. After Tesla had its first battery fire, the public was reassured by his Tesla fanatics that it was a fluke. Yet five weeks later there has been two more Tesla battery fires. The Tesla in Mexico is even on video exploding. Now all of a sudden Tesla fanatics want to claim that battery fires are not an immediate safety concern. The Tesla fanatics make crazy arguments.The fire concern due to the nature of a lithium battery fire is not an immediate safety concern really, it's an economic one.
It seems that despite crash ratings, statistically Chevy Volt's batteries are much safer than Tesla's.
Tesla Motors Inc (TSLA) May Take Tips From GM To Prevent Fire Issues
http://www.valuewalk.com/2013/11/tesla-motors-inc-tsla-may-take-tips-from-gm-on-fire/
GM’s Engineering Chief said that the company has sold 58,000 Chevy Volts since the launch in 2010. Fletcher also said that, despite 300 million miles on the road, not a single incident has occurred similar to that of the Model S, though there were some fire issues in 2011 at the crash-testing phase.
The three fire incidents were a surprise as Tesla Motors Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) had secured the highest safety ranking from authorities, and also has a first responders guide in place. It looks as though the design will have to include more a durable undercarriage protection to avert more incidents.
If nobody cares, then how come your panties are in a wad?You ever get the feeling nobody else really cares that much about your strange obsession about Tesla?
I've noticed that most people only want to see one side of the issue.And, you do realise, that anybody with access to the Internet and Google could likely find everyone of these articles you link to?
Now days that's the easiest way to have an intelligent & civilized conversation. :wink2: Though even those moments are fleeting.Your mind is likely a fascinating study in how it works, that somehow you can enjoy conversations with yourself.
Despite having both gasoline and battery-powered, so far I don't know of any cases where Chevy Volts burst into flames after simply running over road debris.The Chevy Volt carries gasoline onboard making fires a bit more risky, but not so much it concerns me. Personally I'd buy the Chevy Volt before the Tesla.
Tesla fanatics are such hypocrites...... The Tesla fanatics make crazy arguments.
You are thinking there should be some sort of mental standard before people can buy certain items? You might want to be careful what you ask for on that one.Are all Tesla owners so mentally deficient, that they need a computer to give an audio warning to pull over after hitting a large object in the road?
I would guess many of them would have a similar impression of you. Hell, I don't even own a Tesla and I have that impression.I get the impression that a lot of Tesla owners aren't that bright
If nobody cares, then how come your panties are in a wad?
So you don't care that some of the practices of Tesla are jeopardizing the company and investors monies? So you think no one cares about their investment. To some people that might be what they are depending on for their retirement. Don't you think some investors might be concerned that some of Tesla management is dumping their Tesla stock? It's as if some of Tesla's management suspects that Tesla might not go up much and might not survive.
I've noticed that most people only want to see one side of the issue.
You claim you don't care about the topic, yet it's clear by your ignorant argumentative rants that your panties are in a wad. Your posts have been ignorant and dishonest. If you didn't care about the topic, you wouldn't be posting and having a hissy fit. You only care about yourself, not about the people that were hurt by these shady practices.As I read thru this thread, you are about the only person making arguments, and, yes, they seem crazy.
You are thinking there should be some sort of mental standard before people can buy certain items? You might want to be careful what you ask for on that one.
I would guess many of them would have a similar impression of you. Hell, I don't even own a Tesla and I have that impression.
No panties for me, commando is the only way to go. Gotta let things swing....
Nope, I don't care one bit about the practices of Tesla and their management / and their investors. Nor do I care about Herbalife's. Nor, do I care about 3900 other public companies. I only care about the companies I hold in my portfolio. My life is too busy to care about stuff that doesn't impact me in the least.
But, let's have your disclosure. Do you own Tesla? Are you short Tesla? Or, are you just some internet nut that thinks people on an aviation forum are seeking negative information about some car manufacturer?
Many people don't care about either side of this issue.
Titanium probably would give very good protection, however it's probably cost prohibitive. It's been a while since I've worked with titanium, but it was quite expensive and hard to machine.Yeah, I think the ultimate answer will be to change to or retrofit a titanium or steel plate under the battery box.
Titanium probably would give very good protection, however it's probably cost prohibitive. It's been a while since I've worked with titanium, but it was quite expensive and hard to machine.
It's been quite a few years, the parts I dealt with were fairly complex; but the finished titanium parts I dealt with were worth more than gold in their weight.It would likely take less than $50 worth of titanium that doesn't need any particular machining, a flat plate will be fine. Drilling some mounting holes is not a particular chore.
You claim you don't care about the topic, yet it's clear by your ignorant argumentative rants that your panties are in a wad. Your posts have been ignorant and dishonest. If you didn't care about the topic, you wouldn't be posting and having a hissy fit. You only care about yourself, not about the people that were hurt by these shady practices.
Hypocrisy. You have not answered questions honestly. You're a troll and a liar. You don't seem to be capable of having a civilized conversation.Just curious why you care, and you can't seem to answer that question.
Hypocrisy. You have not answered questions honestly. You're a troll and a liar. You don't seem to be capable of having a civilized conversation.
It's been quite a few years, the parts I dealt with were fairly complex; but the finished titanium parts I dealt with were worth more than gold in their weight.
It wouldn't be a simple rectangle. I think one of the problems with the current design, as it doesn't seem to have adequate access for emergency responders. Also unlike metals can increase corrosion.
If possible I would redesign the body so emergency responders could easily deluge the battery with water and/or dry chemical.
FixedIt should have an automatic copper system to eliminate the need for a deluge of water which is ineffective on a class D fire anyway (mostly it's to keep the surrounding materials from igniting). This would add a few hundred to the cost of the building the car.
While the use of water can antagonize the lithium fires, the use of water can help cool neighboring cells to prevent the fire from propagating and reducing the odds of an explosion.It should have an automatic copper system to eliminate the need for a deluge of water which is ineffective on a class D fire anyway (mostly it's to keep the surrounding materials from igniting AND EXPLODING). This would add a few hundred to the cost of the building the car.
An automatic system would help. However they don't always work. Therefore there should be provisions to make it easier for emergency responders to fight battery fires. The Tesla design seems to have made it very difficult for firefighters.If they just install an automatic system, all that is unnecessary.
Ford recalling Escape for catching on fire:
http://www.electronicproducts.com/P...ake_sure_you_don_t_spontaneously_combust.aspx
13 reports of this vehicle catching fire