What a colossal waste of time.
https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media...to-learner?utm_source=epilot&utm_medium=email
https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media...to-learner?utm_source=epilot&utm_medium=email
No you're not a Student Pilot, you are a Private Pilot, but you're still a student and he is your Instructor.I do find the word student confusing after you earn your ppl but keep training. I’m working on my commercial maneuvers now... my CFI is the instructor, I am the learner. I am not a student pilot anymore. Technically I’m still a student but avoiding the term avoids ambiguity as well. I’m ok with that change, but I have no opinion on flight deck vs cockpit.
Your cognitive abilities lack a rational foundation.The term cockpit is sexist.
I thought the end of my training gave me a "license to learn".
Does this mean we now have unlicensed learners?
It's all so confusing.
What a colossal waste of time.
https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media...to-learner?utm_source=epilot&utm_medium=email
See George Carlin "Pussification"We've sure come a long way from "Sticks and stones may break my bones" to "Words matter" to being "Politically Correct" to spending inordinate amounts of taxpayer money having "Fun With Semantics." A LONG way. Just not remotely convinced we've traveled in the correct direction.
I'm not changing how I refer to students... and I hope I am still a student (one who studies) when I die.
Yes, but saying I'm a student is ambiguous as to whether you mean student in the general sense, or student in the specific (student pilot) sense. See below.No you're not a Student Pilot, you are a Private Pilot, but you're still a student and he is your Instructor.
The difference here is that there is no ambiguity. What's the analogue of "student pilot" in your example?When you graduate from high school and go to college, you are still a Student, despite the fact that you're an undergraduate and no longer a high-schooler.
The term cockpit is sexist.
The term cockpit is sexist.
Why?
I do find the word student confusing after you earn your ppl but keep training. I’m working on my commercial maneuvers now... my CFI is the instructor, I am the learner. I am not a student pilot anymore. Technically I’m still a student but avoiding the term avoids ambiguity as well. I’m ok with that change, but I have no opinion on flight deck vs cockpit.
I prefer “Special High Intensity Trainee”
Unbelievable! From the article:
"“Within the industry group the air-carrier people wanted to use ‘pilot-in-training’ and the general aviation people wanted ‘learner.’ After about two years of discussion, the FAA decided on ‘learner’ with the thought that at different times we are all learners."
Took em two years to come up with that ...
Your tax dollars at work!
Come to think of it I do use client more frequently than I probably realize, but student will stick regardless.Y'know, as a CFI, I've seen confusion when talking about "my student" and others automatically thinking "student pilot." So I've experimented with other terms. I know some CFIs use "client." That's decent since CFIs are (or at least should be) professionals, but it doesn't help much if the CFI is an accountant, lawyer, or other professional who has "clients."
So I can see a rationals for wanting to find a generic term to distinguish student pilot from a "student pilot."
But "learners" is pretty awful.
Agree. Almost as bad as when they started using the term mx technician over mechanic.But "learners" is pretty awful.
Of course it will. People resist mandatory changes and non-mandatory language changes can take a generation. Look how successful dropping "biennial" and the "BFR" acronym from "flight review" has been (except, of course to the language police).Come to think of it I do use client more frequently than I probably realize, but student will stick regardless.