E
Ernesto Castro
Guest
...
Last edited by a moderator:
so why not ask him to do an annual inspection in the first place? Why was your plan going in to pay for a pre buy that was an annual inspection, and then pay for an annual inspection immediately afterward? If the pre buy was meant to be just as intensive as an annual, why would you plan up front to pay again for the same thing?and asked him to the all the inspection part of a regular annual inspection
That's not correct. There is nothing that prevents starting an annual inspection, stopping, reassembling the aircraft, and flying it provided there' time remaining on the original annual. If no time left, then a SFP is needed. As mentioned above it appears you've agreed to and paid twice for the same inspection unless there were 2 separate inspections done and completed: pre-buy then an annual inspection. Otherwise the narrative doesn't make much sense dollar-wise or the fact there were 2 separate discrepancy lists and negotiations (7k vs 20k).Why it was not legally an annual inspection? Because once an annual is started the aircraft becomes not airworthy until it's successfully completed.
While those tasks are/can be performed at the same time, they are not part of the annual inspection and each additional task requires its own records entry. A number of shops bill for the annual inspection separately from those tasks as not all owners have them complied with that time.The annual includes things that are not inspection.
Sorry your experience has been awful.…
[*]I didn't pay twice of the same thing. The items I paid for (inspection wise):
- Prebuy inspection to roll into annual after purhace: ~2.5k
- Complete annual after prebuy: ~2.5k
I agree, but the problem is far larger than one mechanic. This is what I would expect from pretty much any mechanic I didn't already have experience with.Well I mean come on... the guy is paying them to inspect the plane so he can buy it. I'd be ****ed off if they found corrosion in the spar because it wasn't technically a "annual". If that the case then I would not pay for a prebuy from these guys.
They quoted you $4200 and it cost $5000. Not much of a stretch considering the work. You should have complained at the $4200.Do you think almost 5k for an annual inspection is too much?
This is not what you stated originally. However, the narrative still doesn’t make sense. The fact you thought the start of an annual inspection made an aircraft unairworthy, follows more you wanted a general check of the aircraft to begin with for anything obvious (1st disc list) and if “good,” to then start the annual and finish it (2nd list). It doesn’t appear to me, based on my experiences, that the same criteria was used for both inspections. Had it been as you 1st stated there would have been only one discrepancy list.They did the prebuy that was going to roll into an annual,
As to the corrosion, it could be simply that as part of the Mooney annual inspection form (2nd list), the shop complied with a bulletin that specifically addressed that area that wasn’t part of your first check “pre-buy” criteria. Nobody likes these results especially with their 1st aircraft. I get that. Regardless, without the shop here to provide their side, we’re still missing half the story. But don’t let it get to you. Pointing fingers doesn’t solve it. Find you a local APIA that will be your mechanic and use him to formulate a route to get your plane fixed and back in the air. Best of luck.For reference, the corrosion that was not seen in the prebuy but was seen one week later in the annual inspection
This is why a "pre-buy" means nothing unless it follows a known standard. Everyone has a different opinion of what a prebuy is. No different than what each person thinks is airworthy.I'd be ****ed off if they found corrosion in the spar because it wasn't technically a "annual".
...
This is why a "pre-buy" means nothing unless it follows a known standard. Everyone has a different opinion of what a prebuy is. No different than what each person thinks is airworthy.
No problem. Now post a reference that defines what a "pre-purchase airworthiness inspection" means to you and we can discuss it. I can think of 4 different references that would fall under that description.OK then i'm asking for a pre-purchase airworthiness inspection
It could be. But it can be whatever buyer, seller, and the mechanic decide it to be except it is written down and agreed to. However, unless you also include the APIA that will be maintaining this aircraft for you there is always the unknown of what he will determine once he sees the aircraft. As mentioned before, airworthy is both objective and subjective to the person making the call. But also keep in mind, these prebuy requirements tend to follow the food chain of aircraft status and condition. There are owners and aircraft out there that need no prebuy at all. Most issues are usually at the lower to mid end where hangar fairies live and owners are not as "engaged" as those at the upper end of the chain. Several PoA'rs are at this upper level.Would the following be one solution/approach? Instead of a "pre-buy", pay the IA for an annual inspection itself.
Yes.Would you expect that if Flight Level Aviation has done an annual inspection then the OP should not have been given an incomplete of squawks initially?
No problem. Now post a reference that defines what a "pre-purchase airworthiness inspection" means to you and we can discuss it. I can think of 4 different references that would fall under that description.
I do agree with the comment that if I had asked for a legal annual inspection they would have found the corrosion in the first place.
Ha. So should the pre-buy also look for corrosion on a Mooney internal tube frame per bulletin 208? It can be just as big corrosion issue for some Mooneys. Or how about if you have a Piper, should your prebuy include pulling the fuel tanks per SB1006 to make sure the spar isn't corroded behind them? As you can see its not as simple as you imply. Good luck with your next prebuy and hope you learned something from this.Well I tell you what it should include and that is spotting corrosion on a spar
I'm thinking just asking for a "pre-buy" is pretty useless.
Unfortunately, on this end of the pre-buy spectrum all is driven by the buyer. Outside of Saavy and a few other providers most mx shops don’t advertise prebuys for puddle jumpers like you see on the commercia/business side. So instead you see the common PoA prebuy story where the buyer flips a coin and gets a prebuy done with minimal due diligence. Its also the reason I always preach to pick your mechanic first before buying an aircraft. They are the one you want in your corner and not Bubba from BFE. Same story, different day.I would think someone offering a pre-buy should be familiar with the airframe he is inspecting, know the trouble areas, and price accordingly.
When I did my pre-buy on my Seneca, I used the Savvy pre-buy service. Since I was going to be a new owner, I wanted some back up to validate what was found during the pre-buy.
Savvy has a pretty good article on pre-buys versus annuals and why the two are and should be different.
https://resources.savvyaviation.com...cles_eaa/EAA_2014-11_prebuy-dos-and-donts.pdf
The pre-buy shop that Savvy picked out used the Savvy specific checklists and I was generally happy with the service. That didn't mean that my first annual was spotless. There was still stuff I had to fix or repair. Some stuff I knew about because it was found on the annual, and some others that weren't.
Ha. So should the pre-buy also look for corrosion on a Mooney internal tube frame per bulletin 208? It can be just as big corrosion issue for some Mooneys. Or how about if you have a Piper, should your prebuy include pulling the fuel tanks per SB1006 to make sure the spar isn't corroded behind them? As you can see its not as simple as you imply. Good luck with your next prebuy and hope you learned something from this.
And that’s the point I trying to make. Its up to the buyer to dictate what they want looked at for their prebuy. What happened to the OP happens on a regular basis—even with top-notch shops. The main reason is some buyers, and especially 1st time buyers, believe a prebuy is equal to an annual inspection. Its not by a long shot on many different levels.Yes, if I was going to purchase a plane I would like to know if the plane I am buying can be flown.
Yes, if I was going to purchase a plane I would like to know if the plane I am buying can be flown.
And that’s the point I trying to make. Its up to the buyer to dictate what they want looked at for their prebuy. What happened to the OP happens on a regular basis—even with top-notch shops. The main reason is some buyers, and especially 1st time buyers, believe a prebuy is equal to an annual inspection. Its not by a long shot on many different levels.
So if you don’t want to follow the same path as many buyers have with their prebuy expectations and results, learn from this example and the other examples on PoA and be a diligent buyer who fully understands what the purpose of a prebuy really is.
I think I would split an annual with the owner.So a pre-buy is useless, why get one? Sounds like they just review what you can see on your own, kind of like a home inspection. If this is true, I wouldn't bother, I would save the money on the pre-buy and put it toward the plane. This is good to know.
Sorry, but a prepurchase inspection isn't going to pick up wing spar corrosion in a Mooney. At best they're going to open up one or two of the wing inspection panels and see how things look. To get at the wing spars you have to pull the whole interior, and I've not seen that done in a prepurchase inspection.
Exactly. Except they only review what the buyer wants or what the seller will allow. Maybe the seller wouldn't allow disassembly to see the spars? Regardless, a prebuy is only as good as what the buyer and seller agree to with the mechanic in the middle. Or you simply buy at a level where a prebuy is not required.Sounds like they just review what you can see on your own, kind of like a home inspection.
And so do owners. The fact the OP agreed to a prebuy based on a "crappy" checklist (his words) then requested an annual based on the Mooney 100hr/annual checklist where the corrosion was found, speaks more to what actually went on than what is being portrayed. Especially since the shop is not here to give their side of the discussion. The only difference in the OPs case is he didn't fly the aircraft back to his APIA who would have been the one to give him the $20k estimate. Then who is at fault?Mechanics need to be honest.
Thats one option that is done. But even then I think it is important that your APIA is the one performing that annual or is at least involved in the process.I think I would split an annual with the owner.