CAF has two Web pages that say it's not in Camarillo anymore, and one that says it is, so .That's a bummer, must be "relatively" recent as it was still there when I last had lunch at CMA.. too bad.
CAF has two Web pages that say it's not in Camarillo anymore, and one that says it is, so .That's a bummer, must be "relatively" recent as it was still there when I last had lunch at CMA.. too bad.
Perhaps it's time for a visit!CAF has two Web pages that say it's not in Camarillo anymore, and one that says it is, so .
I found this in Wikipedia. Not sure whether the info is up-to-date:Perhaps it's time for a visit!
My girlfriend got me a gift certificate to Sky Dive San Diego.. I haven't used it yet but it's on the agenda for this year..
I found this in Wikipedia. Not sure whether the info is up-to-date:
China Doll (N53594) was airworthy and flown by the Commemorative Air Force Museum, however it is currently grounded due to Federal Aviation Administration regulations regarding propeller time as well as having corrosion issues. She was originally scheduled to be restored back to airworthy status by 2019,[5][6] however the severity of the corrosion was more extensive than first thought and the funds to bring her back to serviceable condition are not currently available.
Thanks for the update.I find myself at CMA often. Last time I did the CAF walk around, I was told that China Doll wasn't going to fly again. If it's no longer on the ramp at CMA, it likely left on a truck.
That's sad.. I'll have to make a stop up there this month and take a look myselfI was told that China Doll wasn't going to fly again. If it's no longer on the ramp at CMA, it likely left on a truck
Honestly, learn to read and comprehend. He clearly stated "with my CFI as a student pilot..."
I've heard similar rumors.My mother in law lives in Lodi, so I've flown into there once or twice to pick her up to take her on a flight. The airport runway is pretty rough, and the communication in the air is pretty bad. One time, I stated I was going to do a standard tear drop entry, and got told off and told to avoid overflight. Not so bad that I wouldn't go back, but if you're flying around that airport, definitely keep your head about you and watch for NORDO traffic.
I've heard some folks say it's one of those privately owned airports that is "public use" in name, but in reality they'd prefer if you treated it like a private airport and mostly stayed away. I dunno about that myself, but I could see it being the case.
One time, I stated I was going to do a standard tear drop entry, and got told off and told to avoid overflight.
I've heard some folks say it's one of those privately owned airports that is "public use" in name, but in reality they'd prefer if you treated it like a private airport and mostly stayed away. I dunno about that myself, but I could see it being the case.
I found this in Wikipedia. Not sure whether the info is up-to-date:
China Doll (N53594) was airworthy and flown by the Commemorative Air Force Museum, however it is currently grounded due to Federal Aviation Administration regulations regarding propeller time as well as having corrosion issues. She was originally scheduled to be restored back to airworthy status by 2019,[5][6] however the severity of the corrosion was more extensive than first thought and the funds to bring her back to serviceable condition are not currently available.
I find myself at CMA often. Last time I did the CAF walk around, I was told that China Doll wasn't going to fly again. If it's no longer on the ramp at CMA, it likely left on a truck.
Just landed here and there *is* a C46 here
Makes sense. Once it was found to be unairworthy, it would have been impractical to move it to CAF headquarters (where a couple of their Web pages implied it was located).
When I was jumping in the mid-90s, the odds of death were around 1 in 70,000 jumps.
AADs were purely optional, and I’d say equipage was about 50/50.
Robert Pooley, 46, allegedly continued to work at the Skydive Lodi Parachute Center despite having his rating as a "tandem examiner" suspended by the U.S. Parachute Association in 2015.
That's probably why they're charging him with fraud and not violations of the FARs.I didn't think any of the parachute ratings were based on the FARs, since they aren't airplanes.
Sounds like a bit of stretch, since the "fraud" involves unofficial documents.That's probably why they're charging him with fraud and not violations of the FARs.
Well, fraud generally means that you did not get what you paid for. In this case, clients paid for services from a certified instructor so it may be enough of a bargaining chip for a stiffer settlement even if there isn't a conviction.Sounds like a bit of stretch, since the "fraud" involves unofficial documents.
https://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Skydive-Lodi-Parachute-Center-arrest-lawsuits-16271366.php
A former instructor at the notorious Lodi skydiving center linked to at least 22 deaths since 1981 was arrested Tuesday in connection to serious allegations about his qualifications.
Robert Pooley, 46, allegedly continued to work at the Skydive Lodi Parachute Center despite having his rating as a "tandem examiner" suspended by the U.S. Parachute Association in 2015. This means Pooley should no longer have been able to give skydiving lessons, but prosecutors claim he didn't stop, going so far as to allegedly use the "digital image of the signature" of another certified colleague to sign off on his training sessions. Prosecutors say Pooley hid his suspension from co-workers and clients.
Pooley has been charged with four counts of wire fraud for charging for lessons he was not certified to give and two counts of aggravated identity theft. He could face up to 20 years in prison if convicted....
I'm in my 80's now. Hung around Elsinore when the lake was empty. Wish I was young again.View attachment 97650
FAR part 105 controls skydiving.I didn't think any of the parachute ratings were based on the FARs, since they aren't airplanes.