^^^^ This. FWIW: A common point among the majority of post-retire people I've talked to agree they should have retired earlier vs later as most of their fears were unfounded after retirement.It’s not an absolute number but rather a strategy.
^^^^ This. FWIW: A common point among the majority of post-retire people I've talked to agree they should have retired earlier vs later as most of their fears were unfounded after retirement.It’s not an absolute number but rather a strategy.
In 2008, my sister and I inherited some money. She used it to pay off her house, because she wanted the peace of mind of not having the mortgage payment anymore and was spooked by the big market drop that had just happened at the time. I put mine in the market--I essentially "used my mortgage to invest the money".My financial guy is disappointed I'm not carrying a mortgage. But it's comforting not having a mortgage and I couldn't see taking out a mortgage just to invest the money.
Every 'financial planner' I have ever talked to had a list of insurance plans and mutual funds they were ready to sell to me.
... my advice is do research on your own first. And validate what you read. Then decide if you need professional advice. ...
You've been talking to the wrong kind of financial planner.
I don't want to highjack the thread, but because of my second job all these years, and hanging onto and investing all that effort, we would be better off on the exchange. We had some things happen. It really messed with our retirement income. Some my fault, and some not. I think it will level out now. It looks really good on paper, but actually isn't as good as it looks. One of the main reasons is IRMAA. I have no idea what they are doing, can't get an explanation from SS or Medicare. I've spent the whole week last week on the phone with both. No one can answer what the ridiculous bill I just got is for. But its uggly.You could check prices on the exchange for people age 64, that might change your perspective.
You've been talking to the wrong kind of financial planner.
In 2008, my sister and I inherited some money. She used it to pay off her house, because she wanted the peace of mind of not having the mortgage payment anymore and was spooked by the big market drop that had just happened at the time. I put mine in the market--I essentially "used my mortgage to invest the money".
The markets have had very high performance in the years since then. I'm now in a somewhat better position than she is, relatively speaking.
I don't want to highjack the thread, but because of my second job all these years, and hanging onto and investing all that effort, we would be better off on the exchange. We had some things happen. It really messed with our retirement income. Some my fault, and some not. I think it will level out now. It looks really good on paper, but actually isn't as good as it looks. One of the main reasons is IRMAA. I have no idea what they are doing, can't get an explanation from SS or Medicare. I've spent the whole week last week on the phone with both. No one can answer what the ridiculous bill I just got is for. But its uggly.
Let me see. I have been though fee based, percentage of AUM and standard 'commissioned salesman' type. I found no difference in the quality of advice given. The only difference were the strategies to maximize fee revenue for their employer.
+1 There are some knowledgeable people here but the forum purpose does not select for financial planning expertise.... this forum is not really a good place to get advice. ...
^^^^ This. FWIW: A common point among the majority of post-retire people I've talked to agree they should have retired earlier vs later as most of their fears were unfounded after retirement.
Count me in that group.^^^^ This. FWIW: A common point among the majority of post-retire people I've talked to agree they should have retired earlier vs later as most of their fears were unfounded after retirement.
Knowing what she knows now, does she wish she'd acted differently back then? I don't know, because I'm afraid to talk to her about it. What we *have* talked about is that she is a lot more uncertain about her financial situation in retirement than I am.How does she see this ?
Can you point me to some of this free money? I'd like to get some.As long as the .gov hands out free money to subsidize rising home prices, there is a penalty for owning your home outright. Some are willing to pay that price in exchange for the knowledge that all they have to cover is the taxes and utilities to have a roof over their head.
Anything you buy on the exchange would be inferior to Medicare. There no way your Medicare with the maximum income penalty costs more than the premium off the exchange. At age 64 the lowest monthly premium on the exchange is $669 for a $8700 deductible.
Can you point me to some of this free money? I'd like to get some.
Thanks for all the responses. A lot of good information and food for thought. I guess I have a lot of homework to do before making any changes.
While I agree that it is not fair having to pay extra for something that you already paid for during your working life, if you are pulling 250 or 400k a year in retirement, the $300 extra a month for IRMAA seems hardly a number to fret about.
I just love this topic. Why is there so much of “go hire a financial planner” advice and we seem hesitant to openly talk about details. There are so many variables blah, blah, blah.
Go research it. Average life expectancy in the US is 78.8 years. Life expectancy has not moved much in the past 30 years but pushing out max retirement benefit has. How long has your family tree lived? Are you healthy and take good care of yourself? We are a product of genes from prior generations so be honest here.
Most, not all, planners want to sell you something, either investments or their services. Wall St wants to keep you investing. All these investment houses (TD, Fidelity, Schwab, etc) want to keep you investing. They all went zero commissions to make it easy to stay in the game. It’s business, and their business.
The govt wants you to wait as long as possible for one reason - delay payouts. The govt loves “kick the can down the road”. There are plenty of calculators and graphs that show what collecting at various years will pay and when do the lines intersect. And guess what - they are intersect around the age of 78. Imagine that. Get your SSI statement and graph your specific numbers. It’s not hard.
When to collect - do you think you will be as active at 75 as you will be when you are 65? Don’t think so. In your early retirement years you will want to be more active and that likely means you will want more resources. By taking earlier can I invest and make interest off that? I’m still investing my money by using SSI resources. This also influences when to take. Health care is a crap shoot as who knows what 5 years out will look like.
Many, not all, are simply not educated enough to make this decision and my advice is do research on your own first. And validate what you read. Then decide if you need professional advice. You may. But you may also be able to navigate. Don’t just run and hire a planner without getting yourself educated first.
Your retirement goals (be realistic what do you want to do and what that will cost), your assets, your savings and investments, other income (part time work for ex) your health, your debt, and your ability to stick to a budget are what you need to think through. Answer these and it will provide a lot of clarity on what is best for you. It’s not an absolute number but rather a strategy.
I have thick skin so let the feedback begin.
I sort of disagree with that. I have been seeing Medicare deductions from my paychecks for 51 years prior to seeing any benefits. My younger brother died 10 days after his 65th birthday (pancreatic cancer) and therefore gained NOTHING from his 50 years of advance payments.People forget Medicare is an old age welfare program. If you are in that income bracket, write the check and quit whining.
This is why retirement plans/strategies are so personalized to the individual or couple. In your plan the issue of LTC is important. But with others its not so important based on their experiences or research. The one thing I have learned is just as each person's life is unique so is their retirement decision. There is no one plan, no one reference, no one rule-of-thumb. Plus every plan has an element of risk just like living or investing. So what it really boils down to is what is your level of risk aversion. Regardless, one way to ultimately smoke check your plan is to talk to people who have already been there--done that and retired. I talked to dozens of retirees and they became very instrumental in the (earlier) path I took which is about to come full circle next month. The very first retirement date goal I wrote down was 01/31/2022. I plan to have a party on that date even though it will be 7 years and 6 months too late.but I equate working longer (and putting more money away) as a form of insurance.
I sort of disagree with that. I have been seeing Medicare deductions from my paychecks for 51 years prior to seeing any benefits. My younger brother died 10 days after his 65th birthday (pancreatic cancer) and therefore gained NOTHING from his 50 years of advance payments.
Perhaps it is a "welfare" system for some, but not for everyone. I doubt it is welfare for the OP either.
The title "financial advisor" is often misleading. Critters using that title are often just investment advisors. The typical brokerage house financial advisor is almost always just an investment advisor and of dubious quality anyway. A good financial advisor is involved with all aspects of the client's financial life from saving for milestones like college, to insurance advice, ACA strategies, SS draw strategies, to nagging clients about estate planning, etc. and finally to investment advice. The superman who knows all this will be difficult to find and in some cases will need education on (for example) the client's company pension plan. But finding that kind of advisor and avoiding the investment advisor claiming to be a financial advisor is the goal.You don't need a 'financial advisor'. What you need is someone who understands fed pensions, VA healthcare, ACA eligibility, your companies pension plan and tax consequences of all those things. You probably won't find someone who knows all those things as they apply to your specific situation, it's probably a number of people you need to talk to.
Uh, we’re making nowhere near that kind of cheese in our working income + my .mil and certainly not once we stop working.
Perhaps it is a "welfare" system for some, but not for everyone. I doubt it is welfare for the OP either.
Inflation is running about 6.8% right now, I believe. My investments, under Merrill Lynch and reasonably conservative, are 17%+ this year. (The Dow is up 20% for the year)I've always thought that I would need about $5M to retire without impinging on the principal. But, with the runaway inflation we are experiencing, I don't even think that will be enough.
The title "financial advisor" is often misleading. Critters using that title are often just investment advisors.
One of the interesting things I learned leading up to retiring was the difference in what amount you thought you lived on vs what you actually lived on. A majority equate that amount to their check stub. But when you get down to checking the nickels spent it can be an eye-opener. In my case once I took out all the "non-living expenses" to include retirement investments my overhead dropped considerably. At first I thought my math was wrong. But it wasn't. The same expenses I had prior to retirement are there afterwards. What changed was certain amounts as you noted with the work related ones reduced while others increased like medical premiums. And even with the change in lifestyle after retirement my monthly overhead doesn't vary more than 10%. What I'm not understanding is your $3120.00 x2 bills after moving to medicare. Even at $500K+ income premiums on Parts B/D are not past $700/month each. And while the top shelf supplemental plans can push $1000 each per month still doesn't get you to $3000+. Is there something else thats driving this cost?WE have been surprised at how little we spend after retirement.
And that's what should go on your "retire to something" list. But also keep in mind once you retire, what was once "important" may change when that ol' job is no longer in the way. Had 2 clients sell their aircraft after retirement to buy unique surface transportation modes as they now had the time to now explore the areas they used to fly over. But you have to start somewhere.make sure you can afford your hobbies,
I plan to live off my pension and IRA withdrawals, and delay taking SS. This will allow for a guaranteed 7% a year growth in SS.
Don't you have to have a QHDHCP "qualifying high deductible healthcare plan" to open an HSA or has that changed? I used to have one before the "Affordable" Care Act killed my insurance plan that Obama told me I could keep. Well, technically it didn't kill it, just quadrupled the cost.We contributed to an HSA IRA for a few years before I retired. Anyone looking toward the future might want to look into this. You put the money in pre-tax, it grows tax free, and if you spend it on medical things, it's spent tax free. I think the only place that is triple tax free.
Don't you have to have a QHDHCP...