ARFlyer
En-Route
Our 172N had had several large ticket items break over the last few months. We have thoughts that a lot of the issues have been caused by the previous shop. The last straw was a mag eating itself the other night on me at low altitude. It had 2700 hours on it with no 500 hour overhaul.
The other partners and I want the maintenance tightened up. My thought is to throw it into Progressive Maintenance. The Service Manual recommends Progressive for airframes with more then 200 hours of use a year. We were averaging between 150 to 200 hours with an expected 300-400 hours in the next year. I’ve consulted with our new mechanic and another one recommended by some buddies. Both highly approve of the idea. They said it will be more $$$$ up front but that we will save money in the long run. They also recommended completing some of the SIDs as the airframe is getting up in age.
I understand that it’s FAA Approved and a Custom Program for our aircraft has to be written.
What do y’all say?
The other partners and I want the maintenance tightened up. My thought is to throw it into Progressive Maintenance. The Service Manual recommends Progressive for airframes with more then 200 hours of use a year. We were averaging between 150 to 200 hours with an expected 300-400 hours in the next year. I’ve consulted with our new mechanic and another one recommended by some buddies. Both highly approve of the idea. They said it will be more $$$$ up front but that we will save money in the long run. They also recommended completing some of the SIDs as the airframe is getting up in age.
I understand that it’s FAA Approved and a Custom Program for our aircraft has to be written.
What do y’all say?