Ed Haywood
En-Route
I am doing a frame up rebuild on my Decathlon in conjunction with an engine overhaul. Panel starts going in shortly. Time to make a final decision on instrumentation.
I figure it would be dumb to get a new engine and not get a monitor with 4 cylinder EGT/CHT to help track break-in and diagnose any install problems. Plus the panel and firewall are totally accessible right now, so this would be the time to upgrade.
I am looking hard at the EI CGR-30P and the JPI EDM-830. The EI would seem to have the edge because it is primary. The trend among upgraders seems to be to put in a primary EMS and toss the old gauges.
However, I find myself questioning that approach in my case. Right now my oil temp, oil pressure, volts/amps, tach, and manifold pressure are all less than 2 years old. Seems a waste to toss them. Further, I'm not sure I like the idea of putting all my eggs in one basket. If the EI goes down, I am AOG and totally dependent upon one source of support and parts. If one of my individual gauges goes down, I have multiple options to obtain a replacement.
I also kind of like the idea of redundancy in the air. So, keeping my round gauges and installing the JPI to get backup readings plus EGT/CHT and fuel flow is appealing to me.
Cost of both options is equal.
But seems I am swimming against the popular current with this preference. What say ye?
I figure it would be dumb to get a new engine and not get a monitor with 4 cylinder EGT/CHT to help track break-in and diagnose any install problems. Plus the panel and firewall are totally accessible right now, so this would be the time to upgrade.
I am looking hard at the EI CGR-30P and the JPI EDM-830. The EI would seem to have the edge because it is primary. The trend among upgraders seems to be to put in a primary EMS and toss the old gauges.
However, I find myself questioning that approach in my case. Right now my oil temp, oil pressure, volts/amps, tach, and manifold pressure are all less than 2 years old. Seems a waste to toss them. Further, I'm not sure I like the idea of putting all my eggs in one basket. If the EI goes down, I am AOG and totally dependent upon one source of support and parts. If one of my individual gauges goes down, I have multiple options to obtain a replacement.
I also kind of like the idea of redundancy in the air. So, keeping my round gauges and installing the JPI to get backup readings plus EGT/CHT and fuel flow is appealing to me.
Cost of both options is equal.
But seems I am swimming against the popular current with this preference. What say ye?