What happened to this?
On Nov. 18, 2010, the FAA issued a proposed rule that would require all pilot certificates to include a photo of the certificate holder.
Budget issues.
Is it still a go?
I don't really care, other than from a cost perspective. What on earth is the problem with requiring someone to flip a drivers license or passport in addition to the pilot certificate if it really matters???????? Why reinvent the wheel, for the 721st time?????
I recall reading somewhere that the FAA wasn't in favor of the pictures but homeland insecurity was behind the rule. Last I heard they dumped the idea due to the cost of implementing it and the lack of usefulness.
Actually, the photo ID requirement appears to have been part of a law passed in 2004, so neither the FAA or DHS had anything to do with it. Odd to issue an NPRM for something allegedly mandated by congress.
It would be easier if I could take my FAA credentials to my State DMV and they could then ammend my Driver's License with my Pilot License. Same way I got my motorcycle endorsement.
Even if they do get pics on the pilot certificate, what do you want to bet the the TSA mensa members don't accept them when you try to board a commercial flight?
Didn't they just recently require everyone with a paper license get it replaced with plastic? Wouldnt it have been a better idea to require the photo change at the same time? At least have all the hassle at one time, instead of multiple hassles...
But I don't think a pilot's certificate is meant to be a security ID, picture or not. All is means is that you are licensed to fly a certain type of aircraft. AFAIK you are not subject to a background check unless you are foreign or you work for an air carrier which follows certain TSA programs.I'm pretty sure that the picture pilot license is a congressional mandate.
I have a TWIC card (Transport Workers Identity Card, issued by TSA) that I use at the airport. In the many many times I have used it, it was only questioned 3 times and was settled quickly when I pointed to it on their list of approved IDs.
What I'm hoping will happen is that they make a consolidated access pass issued on a security check. That's basically what the TWIC card is for access to inland ports and waterways. I'm cool with carrying a security ID, no problems...
But I don't think a pilot's certificate is meant to be a security ID, picture or not. All is means is that you are licensed to fly a certain type of aircraft. AFAIK you are not subject to a background check unless you are foreign or you work for an air carrier which follows certain TSA programs.
That may have changed. A driver's license wasn't meant to be a security ID either.
But that's only to prove you are legally in the country, not a real criminal background check which is what I think Henning was talking about.Since the 'Real ID' act, they are intended to be a security ID.
But that's only to prove you are legally in the country, not a real criminal background check which is what I think Henning was talking about.
I don't really care, other than from a cost perspective. What on earth is the problem with requiring someone to flip a drivers license or passport in addition to the pilot certificate if it really matters???????? Why reinvent the wheel, for the 721st time?????
Hilter would have fixed the "ID" fiasco long ago.![]()
I'm pretty sure that the picture pilot license is a congressional mandate.
I have a TWIC card (Transport Workers Identity Card, issued by TSA) that I use at the airport. In the many many times I have used it, it was only questioned 3 times and was settled quickly when I pointed to it on their list of approved IDs.
What I'm hoping will happen is that they make a consolidated access pass issued on a security check. That's basically what the TWIC card is for access to inland ports and waterways. I'm cool with carrying a security ID, no problems... One please though, lets make things a bit more efficient and have a single outlet security check. I have been through the same security check at least 20 times and that is on top of having even higher security clearances in the past and by multiple governments. This is grossly inefficient and expensive just wasting money willy nilly at "security projects" rather than having an efficient "security program". It's bad stewardship of funds is what it is. You can apply for whatever level of clearance and regardless of where you are be it an airport, seaport, government assignment... whatever, if 'x' security rating applies and your card rates that or higher, no further sweat, verify the biometrics and be on your way. At this point every program has its own check requirement and of course when you're traveling, your badge from one airport doesn't transfer to the next.
Fees, control, more government intrusion, power?
Pick one or all.
It's vapid stupidity leading to all of the above.But, it's none of the above, it's about vapid stupidity.
The DL in the setting of commercial airlines is simply to prove that you are who you say you are in order for the name-check the airline runs to be effective.
How?
The name I use to order the ticket doesn't have to match my ID - my ID just has to match the piece of paper that I print and hand to the "document checker".