Shows what a pu--y cat the PC-12 is. That thing wobbles like a cherokee, impressive given its size.
Not throwing down on that.
One of my biggest fears is wasting needed energy, before reaching the field.
(might throw down on the title though, "PC12 safe" lol)
They are anything but tame in a stall. They have both a stick shaker and pusher. Aside from a stall, they truly are a pu**y cat to operate and fly safely.
PC12 stall testing with the shaker/pusher disabled.
Absolutely! My CFIs have always taught me to do circles above or beside the runway or landing spot of you need to scrub energy. Not before you get there.
Turbines are much less likely to stop running than piston engines, on a per-hour basis. They also fly many more hours, on average, than the given piston engine. I'll take the PT-6, please (or the GE Catalyst, if available.)buh buh buh single turbines are SAAAAAFER than two pistons!
Walked away from it, ergo good landing.
They are anything but tame in a stall. They have both a stick shaker and pusher. Aside from a stall, they truly are a pu**y cat to operate and fly safely.
PC12 stall testing with the shaker/pusher disabled.
They were testing to see if it met the stall requirements for certification. It failed. That is why it has to have the stick shaker/pusher. There is no requirement to test it using bad technique.Do you know if the pilot is using appropriate rudder inputs during those stalls, or is this a test to see how it performs without rudder input? The videos are too grainy for me to identify rudder movement.
Unfortunately this guy had engine problem, airport close by, engine stabilizes producing some power, so he decided to try to make DFW about 20 or so away, engine said nope, gets back to first airport with altitude to spare, then does a 360 on a left base, ends up short.
Moral of the story, get on the fricken ground at first sign of trouble like this and sort it out there. I hope he is ok.
these summaries always are great. Glad he is safe. Plane could have been spared though. Will be interesting to see what happened to the engine. I don’t know much about PT6’s anybody with turbine experience care to speculate ?
Only one PT-6 failure here...King Air and non-event also (KA does a wonderful ILS to 300&1 on one engine). But much like any statistic, the statistics don’t matter if you’re one of the “one in xxx” that it happens to.I don't think twins are any safer than singles................but I will say that two PT-6's have quit on me. Both were in a King Air and were non-events.
The P&W MTBF published statistics are "fake news!"